Share

We're Not Wrong
We're Not Wrong about The Epstein List and Texas Power
The conversation covers a range of topics, including birthday plans, camera preferences, an upcoming live show in Iowa, the release of names linked to Jeffrey Epstein, Jennifer's skepticism about the political process, grievances about the studio setup, and a legal ruling on Texas power companies' liability. This part of the conversation focuses on the negligence and lack of preparedness in the Texas power grid, the flaws of the deregulated energy network, the need for accountability and consequences for power outages, and the potential solutions to the problems. The discussion also explores the impact of third-party candidates on elections, the misconceptions about voting percentages, and the redefinition of the time between Christmas and New Year's. Additionally, the conversation delves into the use of AI in healthcare, the dysfunction of the healthcare market, and the benefits of direct primary care. In this conversation, the hosts discuss various topics including Trump's smell and their appreciation for runners.
Chapters
00:00
Birthday plans and camera preferences
03:14
Upcoming live show in Iowa
05:16
Jennifer's concerns about Iowa
06:21
Discussion on Jeffrey Epstein's list
09:05
Jennifer's skepticism about the political process
13:14
Jennifer's grievances and Justin's studio setup
19:10
Impending release of names linked to Jeffrey Epstein
26:10
Conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein
37:05
Legal ruling on Texas power companies' liability
48:05
Negligence and Lack of Preparedness
50:25
Deregulated Energy Network vs. Energy Monopolies
51:46
The Duty to Provide Electricity
53:12
Consequences for Power Outages
54:06
The Flaws of the Deregulated Texan Model
55:03
The Need for Accountability and Consequences
55:31
The Role of Sovereign Immunity
56:57
The Benefits and Drawbacks of Vertically Integrated Companies
57:51
The Impact of Extreme Weather on Power Grids
58:44
The Lack of Consequences for Power Companies
59:37
Solutions: Removing Sovereign Immunity and Requiring Duty to Provide Electricity
01:05:37
Redefining the Time Between Christmas and New Year's
01:06:07
Reviewing the Bingo Card
01:06:25
The Impact of Third-Party Candidates on Elections
01:07:20
The Flaws of the Two-Party System
01:09:08
The Misconception of Voting Percentages
01:10:05
The Role of Third-Party Candidates in Elections
01:11:17
The 2000 Election and Ralph Nader
01:13:08
Encouraging Voter Turnout and Redefining Voting
01:14:51
Naming the Time Between Christmas and New Year's
01:19:31
The Use of AI in Healthcare
01:20:56
The Dysfunction of the Healthcare Market
01:24:55
The Benefits of Direct Primary Care
01:30:27
The Crisis in Primary Care and the Role of AI
01:33:10
The Dysfunction of the Health Insurance Market
01:34:36
Discussion on Trump's Smell
01:35:01
Appreciation for Runners
More episodes
View all episodes

About the Cornell Seven and Phone-Free Concerts
02:06:44|The gang digs into the sexual assault allegations against the Cornell Seven, the handling of the investigation, and the debate over New York’s consent law. Should the state close the loophole around voluntary intoxication? Then they turn to concerts that require fans to lock their phones away. Is a clearer view and fewer distractions worth giving up photos, videos, and easy contact with the outside world?Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:04:44 - Cornell Seven01:26:46 - Phone-Free Concerts01:40:34 - Emails02:00:15 - Wrap-up
About Taxpayer-Funded Trump Ads and School Phone Bans
02:03:00|The gang digs into the nearly $1.5 million in taxpayer money spent on ads praising President Trump. Where’s the line between a public-service announcement and campaigning on our dime? Then they turn to a study that found no clear improvement in students’ social wellbeing after a school smartphone ban. What should we expect these bans to accomplish, and what would convince us they aren’t working?Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:19:08 - Taxpayer-Funded Trump Ads00:43:22 - Iran01:04:55 - School Phone Bans01:16:44 - Emails01:58:48 - Wrap-up
About Ed Sheeran and the Paramount–Warner Bros. Merger
01:49:19|The gang digs into the backlash against Ed Sheeran after Macklemore was dropped from his tour over his pro-Palestinian performances. How much control does a headliner have, and who gets to decide what’s said onstage? Then they turn to the states’ settlement over Paramount’s proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. Did the attorneys general secure meaningful protections, or trade away their leverage for corporate promises?Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:06:57 - Ed Sheeran00:36:18 - Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger01:08:20 - Emails01:46:26 - Wrap-up
About Slowing AI and Canada's European Pivot
02:14:29|The gang digs into an Anthropic whistleblower’s warning about the race toward superintelligent AI and the growing calls to slow development. Should Washington step in, and how much should we trust the companies sounding the alarm about their own technology? Then they turn to Canada’s pursuit of a closer alliance with Europe and renewed independence pushes within the UK. What do these moves tell us about the future of some of America’s closest allies?Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:19:36 - Slowing AI01:18:47 - Canada's European Pivot01:40:07 - Emails02:09:44 - Wrap-up
About Germany's AfD and 'Kirkaversary'
01:45:04|The gang digs into Germany's AfD party, which scraped together nearly 44% of the vote in the country's recent election. Is this another example of far right politics on the rise, or is there a bit of nuance to this victory? Then they turn to the 'Kirkaversary,' a meme-filled online event centered around the one-year anniversary of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. How far is too far when it comes to jokes about political violence?Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:21:25 - AfD Victory00:55:06 - Kirkaversary01:18:48 - Emails01:40:53 - Wrap-up
About Trump's Venezuela Oil Deal and Syracuse University
01:52:19|The gang talks through Trump's 100-year oil deal with Venezuela, asking both whether it's a good deal and whether it's a deal the government should be making in the first place. Then they turn to Justin's alma mater, Syracuse University, which faces funding issues amid reduced enrollment and increased tuition. Is it a one-off problem for this specific school, or a sign of larger issues facing higher education?Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:22:06 - Trump's Venezuela Oil Deal00:47:03 - Syracuse01:21:52 - Emails01:49:02 - Wrap-up
About Mail-in Voting and Travel Sports
01:45:13|The gang discusses the recent Supreme Court decision that allows the Trump administration to implement parts of its executive order restricting mail-in voting during the midterms. They also dig into a recent New York Magazine piece about youth sports, which have grown increasingly expensive through year-round travel programs.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:22:22 - Mail-in Voting00:51:24 - Travel Sports01:10:48 - Emails01:42:10 - Wrap-up
About Natalie Harp and Matchmaking
01:30:15|The gang digs into the fallout following a jab Jon Ossoff made about Trump assistant and long-time fan Natalie Harp, who previously worked at One America News prior to joining his team in 2024. Are these sorts of comments and insinuations fair, or did Ossoff cross a line? They also discuss a recent NYT profile around matchmaking, and wonder if these paid services are worth it as an alternative to apps like Tinder.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:17:14 - Natalie Harp00:43:47 - Matchmaking01:11:33 - Emails01:24:44 - Wrap-up
About Alberta Separatists and Flock Cameras
01:41:50|The gang discusses Alberta's upcoming referendum on whether the province should leave Canada for independence. Is this a move towards a freer Alberta, or a repeat of Brexit? They also discuss Flock security cameras, as anger continues to grow towards the company's surveillance programs online and LA's mayor urges the LAPD to end their contract.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:15:57 - Alberta00:42:40 - Flock01:03:53 - Emails01:37:44 - Wrap-up