Share

We're Not Wrong
About the Border and Trump's NY Business Trial Penalty
Justin and Andrew discuss their recent press junket with Americans for Prosperity to the border and address ethical concerns. They also explore the composition of people crossing the border and the reasons behind their migration. The conversation includes the importance of listening to border patrol and diplomatic solutions, the need for walls in certain areas and diplomatic efforts, the impact of Trump's actions on immigration, the need for more reasoned dialogue and less racial politics. They continue with the financial penalty on Trump in a NY Civil Trial and its impact on his image, concerns about prosecutorial selection and excessive monetary damages, the impact of Trump's actions on banks and victims, and the victimless crime argument and the consequences of Trump's actions.
Chapters
00:00
Introduction and Wallace's Adventures
01:21
Considering New Life Choices
01:58
Low Energy Show
02:27
Justin's Influence and Travel Plans
03:25
Early Morning Flights
04:21
Political Campaigns and Dropping Out
05:18
The Grueling Process of Running for Office
06:14
Suspending Campaigns and Gathering Delegates
07:11
Choosing Primary Locations
51:15
Broken asylum system and high bar for asylum claims
52:39
The need for better logistics and enforcement
53:33
Majority of people show up for their asylum trials
54:29
Allowing legal immigrants to work and integrate into society
55:23
Trump's rhetoric and the divisive nature of the immigration debate
56:15
Listening to border patrol and diplomatic solutions
01:01:30
The need for walls in certain areas and diplomatic efforts
01:06:18
Trump's actions and the impact on immigration
01:11:54
The cruelty of the immigration debate and the need for a different conversation
01:13:23
The need for more reasoned dialogue and less racial politics
01:14:51
Trump's financial penalty and the impact on his image
01:19:05
Concerns about prosecutorial selection and excessive monetary damages
01:25:44
The impact of Trump's actions on banks and victims
01:27:31
The victimless crime argument and the consequences of Trump's actions
01:32:00
The monetary damages and the comparison to other crimes
01:33:24
The Systemic Issue of White Collar Crimes
01:34:17
Prosecutorial Element and Long-Term Implications
01:35:36
Consistent Prosecution of Bad Businessmen
01:36:30
Political Implications and Narrative
01:37:00
Implications on Other Cases and Public Perception
01:38:49
Two Tiers of Justice and Concerns
01:39:18
Trump's Criminal History and Public Perception
01:40:14
Trump's Responsibility for His Prosecution
01:41:00
Prosecutorial Motives and Political Implications
01:41:57
Inconsistency in Prosecution and Concerns
01:43:24
Rampant White-Collar Crime and the Bigger Problem
01:43:53
Lying on Loan Applications and the Perception of Crime
01:44:50
The Perception of Crimes and the Need for Consistency
01:45:44
Voting Against One's Own Interests
01:46:38
The Perception of Trump's Criminality and Political Narrative
01:47:36
Trump's Political Showmanship and Narrative
01:48:26
Concerns about Lawfare and Prosecutorial Motives
01:49:50
The Perception of Corruption and Keeping Classified Documents
01:50:42
Keeping Classified Documents and Memory
01:52:19
Voting Against One's Own Interests and Tribalism
01:54:55
02:26:08
Regional Culture and Politics
More episodes
View all episodes

About Mail-in Voting and Travel Sports
01:45:13|The gang discusses the recent Supreme Court decision that allows the Trump administration to implement parts of its executive order restricting mail-in voting during the midterms. They also dig into a recent New York Magazine piece about youth sports, which have grown increasingly expensive through year-round travel programs.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:22:22 - Mail-in Voting00:51:24 - Travel Sports01:10:48 - Emails01:42:10 - Wrap-up
About Natalie Harp and Matchmaking
01:30:15|The gang digs into the fallout following a jab Jon Ossoff made about Trump assistant and long-time fan Natalie Harp, who previously worked at One America News prior to joining his team in 2024. Are these sorts of comments and insinuations fair, or did Ossoff cross a line? They also discuss a recent NYT profile around matchmaking, and wonder if these paid services are worth it as an alternative to apps like Tinder.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:17:14 - Natalie Harp00:43:47 - Matchmaking01:11:33 - Emails01:24:44 - Wrap-up
About Alberta Separatists and Flock Cameras
01:41:50|The gang discusses Alberta's upcoming referendum on whether the province should leave Canada for independence. Is this a move towards a freer Alberta, or a repeat of Brexit? They also discuss Flock security cameras, as anger continues to grow towards the company's surveillance programs online and LA's mayor urges the LAPD to end their contract.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:15:57 - Alberta00:42:40 - Flock01:03:53 - Emails01:37:44 - Wrap-up
About Max Miller and Data Centers
01:52:16|The gang discusses the allegations around Rep. Max Miller, as well as Jasmine Sun's recent reporting around the backlast to data centers. Plus, some thoughts on the Michigan race and the state of the Democratic party.https://jasmi.news/p/no-data-centers-in-my-backyardChapters00:00:00 - Intro00:19:02 - Michigan00:37:39 - Max Miller01:02:51 - Data Centers01:17:02 - Emails01:47:14 - Wrap-up
About Gavin Newsom's Affair and Strategic Wrinkles
01:20:02|The gang digs into Gavin Newsom's one-time affair after the woman in question — Ruby Rippey — published an account of the scandal in Vanity Fair. Will this affect Newsom's 2028 aspirations, or is this episode deserving of different comparisons than Eric Swalwell and Graham Platner. They also discuss the growing movement towards "strategic wrinkles," as those looking for cosmetic treatments now look for just enough signs of aging to not look unnatural.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:09:48 - Gavin Newsom00:35:20 - Strategic Wrinkles00:59:09 - Emails01:15:37 - Wrap-up
About Darlene Graham's Senate Run and Soccer in the US
01:39:58|In a semi-sequel to last week's episode, the gang discusses Darlene Graham's decision to run for a full Senate term, following her appointment to the seat her brother held for more than two decades. Is she a legit candidate, or is this stepping in the way of other politicians with more experience who might want this rare opportunity? They also look at the popularity of soccer in the US, and wonder whether this year's World Cup was a turning point for the sport in a country that has otherwise never cared.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:18:02 - Darlene Graham01:02:07 - Soccer in the US01:14:11 - Emails01:37:13 - Wrap-up
About Lindsey Graham's Death and Meta Smart Glasses
02:10:54|The crew gathers to discuss the unexpected passing of Lindsey Graham, examining the political legacy he leaves behind following over 30 years of serving in the Senate. They then turn to Meta's AI smart glasses, which is expanding outside of its Ray-Ban partnership to create cheaper smart glasses, despite ongoing privacy concerns.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:21:31 - Lindsey Graham00:59:03 - Meta Smart Glasses01:26:29 - Emails02:01:36 - Wrap-up
About Graham Platner Dropping Out and the "Missing Middle"
01:25:23|The gang convenes to discuss the latest Graham Platner scandal, this time in the form of a sexual assault allegation. Following multiple supporters distancing themselves from Platner, the candidate was heavily rumored to drop out days before the deadline — and, indeed, dropped out hours after this recording. The crew discusses the legacy of Platner's campaign, what's next for Democrats in Maine, and why this was the story that finally sunk his career. Then they turn to the "Missing Middle," as the 45-64 population continues to shrink, potentially causing havoc on both key elements of society and the economy.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:20:51 - Graham Platner00:51:02 - Missing Middle01:03:37 - Emails01:17:49 - Wrap-up
About America at 250 and the Rise of the DSA
01:36:33|The gang discusses the legacy and history of America as it celebrates its 250th anniversary. Are some of the more brutal chapters enough to outweigh the good the USA has brought to the world, or is it worth giving these first 250 years a failing grade? After, the group turns to the ongoing rise of the DSA. Fresh off some big primary wins in NYC and Colorado, who should be the most overjoyed at these recent successes: Democrats, Republicans, or simply the DSA themselves?Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:20:20 - America at 25000:41:55 - Rise of the DSA01:19:19 - Emails01:31:13 - Wrap-up