Share
Babbage from The Economist
The bomb (part 1): were nuclear weapons inevitable?
•
Where did the world’s most devastating weapon come from? In a four-part series, we go behind the scenes at America's nuclear laboratories to understand how a scientific-mystery story about the ingredients of matter led to a world-changing (and second-world-war-ending) bomb less than five decades later.
Nuclear weapons have been central to geopolitical power ever since. Now America is seeking to modernise its stockpile and, in doing so, its scientists are pushing the frontiers of extreme physics, materials science and computing.
In episode one, we look at the birth of nuclear physics—the science that emerged early in the 20th century to answer a mystery: what is an atom actually made of?
Host: Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor. Contributors: Frank Close, a physicist and author of “Destroyer of Worlds”, a history of the birth of nuclear physics; Cheryl Rofer, a chemist who used to work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL); and Nicholas Lewis, a historian at LANL.
This episode features archive from the Atomic Heritage Foundation.
Listen to episode two here.
Transcripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.
This is a free episode. To continue listening to “The Bomb”, you’ll need to subscribe.
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
More episodes
View all episodes
What happens when AI builds itself?
49:39|What happens if AI models get so good that they can build their own successors? So model A builds a better model B, which then builds an even better model C, without any humans to slow things down? The answer could be a high-speed rush towards an AI superintelligence that is beyond human understanding, and possibly beyond human control. This process, known as recursive self-improvement, may be much closer than people realise – perhaps just a couple of years away. So is the world ready for an artificial intelligence explosion?Guests and hosts:Max Tegmark, MIT physics professor, co-founder and leader of the Future of Life InstituteAlex Hern, The Economist’s AI writerAlok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor Topics covered:Recursive Self Improvement in AIUS export ban on Anthropic’s Fable 5 modelTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Eat your electronics, boost your health
41:03|Working out what might be going wrong inside your gut can involve invasive tests. What if you could swallow a pill to monitor your health instead? Engineers are developing miniaturised, ingestible electronics to diagnose, monitor—and even treat—medical conditions. In the future, these electronics could even be made entirely from food.Guests and hosts:Giovanni Traverso of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)David Adam, a journalist for The EconomistReza Ghodssi of the University of MarylandAlok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor Topics covered:Gastrointestinal disordersMedical technologyTargeted drug delivery Transcripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Influencers v evidence-based medicine (part two)
34:02|There’s a lot of medical misinformation online. How do you know who, or what, to trust? To help you think through the fog, we’re bringing you two conversations on health, medicine, evidence and trust in the digital age. In this second episode, we discuss how scientists build consensus and what that can teach the rest of us about navigating an era of confusing, social-media-driven health advice.Guests and hosts:Helen Pearson, author of “Beyond Belief” and a senior editor at NatureAlok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editorTopics covered:Evidence-based medicineClinical trialsArtificial intelligenceTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Influencers v evidence-based medicine (part one)
36:28|Many people turn to the internet for medical advice. But there’s a lot of misinformation out there. To help you think through the fog, over the next two weeks we’re bringing you two conversations about health, medicine, evidence and trust in the digital age. In the first episode, we diagnose the problem: how online influencers and AI diagnoses are turning people away from evidence-based advice. Guests and hosts:Deborah Cohen, author of “Bad Influence”Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editorTopics covered:Wellness trendsHealthcare technologyArtificial intelligenceTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
A tale of two outbreaks
37:49|A rare disease spreading on a cruise ship triggered memories of covid-19. But while people worried about hantavirus cases reaching their shores, a much larger outbreak of Ebola took hold in central Africa. The two outbreaks have come in the wake of a series of worrying developments for international public health agencies: America has left the World Health Organisation and the country has also gutted its spending on international aid. How should pathogenic threats be handled in this post-aid era? Guests and hosts:Slavea Chankova, The Economist’s health-care correspondentNicole Tischler of Fundación Ciencia & Vida, ChileTom Geisbert of the University of Texas Medical BranchHost: Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor Topics covered:Andes hantavirusBundibugyo EbolavirusPandemic preparednessTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Maths enters its AI era
47:50|Not long ago, AI models struggled with basic arithmetic. Now, they’re solving complex mathematical conjectures. But researchers want to go further. They think AI could help them organise the mathematical literature into a common language—thereby finding connections between hitherto-disparate fields and, perhaps, even making completely new discoveries in one of the most fundamental areas of human inquiry.Guests and hosts:Anjani Trivedi, The Economist’s global business correspondentTerence Tao of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)Patrick Shafto of America’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)Maryna Viazovska of L'École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor Topics covered:MathematicsLarge language modelsAutoformalisationTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Michael Pollan on the mystery of consciousness
40:21|What is consciousness? It’s a question scientists have been struggling to answer for decades. Author Michael Pollan has been searching for scientific evidence that could unlock the mystery. His journey extends from humans to animals and even plants. But could consciousness ever exist in machines?Guests and hosts:Michael Pollan, author of “A World Appears”Host: Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor Topics covered:ConsciousnessSentienceNeural correlates of consciousnessTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Why runners are getting faster
37:54|Sporting history was made at this year’s London Marathon. Sabastian Sawe became the first man to finish a competitive race in less than two hours. How are elite athletes getting so much faster? We investigate how runners are harnessing the science of physiology and the technology of shoes to increase their speed. Plus, how anybody can train for a marathon—or just get fit fast.Guests and hosts: Ainslie Johnstone, The Economist’s data and science correspondentTim Cross, senior science writer and author of the “Well Informed” newsletterHost: Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editorTopics covered: London MarathonAdidas Adizero Adios Pro Evo 3Exercise hacksAudio and commentary taken from the BBC's live coverage of the London Marathon, April 26th 2026.Transcripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Chernobyl: a laboratory like no other
44:48|In the popular imagination, the Chernobyl nuclear-power plant sits in an abandoned, post-apocalyptic wasteland. In reality, the site of the world’s worst nuclear-energy disaster is a thriving experimentation ground for scientists studying the long-term impacts of radiation. This week, 40 years after the meltdown, we investigate what that laboratory has found so far. Guests and hosts: Jason Palmer, host of “The Intelligence” podcastOlena Pareniuk of the Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power PlantsJim Smith of the University of PortsmouthAlok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editorTopics covered: Chernobyl nuclear disasterNuclear safetyRadiation physicsTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.