Share

cover art for Babbage: How drones are transforming warfare in Ukraine

Babbage from The Economist

Babbage: How drones are transforming warfare in Ukraine

The use of drones in the war in Ukraine has been increasing. Unmanned vehicles capture battlefield images, relay co-ordinates, and strike targets in Ukraine and even Russia. Whether purpose-built military devices or off-the-shelf civilian technology, the drones are having an outsized impact. How are they influencing battles? And what do they mean for the future of warfare?


Oliver Carroll, our correspondent in Ukraine, explores the purpose and effectiveness of drones in the war. Ulrike Franke of the European Council on Foreign Relations explains the potential that drone technology offers to armies. Plus, The Economist’s Benjamin Sutherland travels to Kyiv, to investigate how engineers in underground workshops are tinkering with consumer drones and turning them into military machines. Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor, hosts.  


If you love Babbage, why not work with us? We’re hiring for an Assistant Audio Producer to work on the show. Apply by May 15th.


The Economist is also seeking applications for the 2023 Richard Casement internship. The successful candidate will spend three months with us in London writing about science and technology. More details here: economist.com/casement2023.


For full access to The Economist’s print, digital and audio editions subscribe at economist.com/podcastoffer and sign up for our weekly science newsletter at economist.com/simplyscience.

More episodes

View all episodes

  • Eat your electronics, boost your health

    41:03|
    Working out what might be going wrong inside your gut can involve invasive tests. What if you could swallow a pill to monitor your health instead? Engineers are developing miniaturised, ingestible electronics to diagnose, monitor—and even treat—medical conditions. In the future, these electronics could even be made entirely from food.Guests and hosts:Giovanni Traverso of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)David Adam, a journalist for The EconomistReza Ghodssi of the University of MarylandAlok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor Topics covered:Gastrointestinal disordersMedical technologyTargeted drug delivery Transcripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
  • Influencers v evidence-based medicine (part two)

    34:02|
    There’s a lot of medical misinformation online. How do you know who, or what, to trust? To help you think through the fog, we’re bringing you two conversations on health, medicine, evidence and trust in the digital age. In this second episode, we discuss how scientists build consensus and what that can teach the rest of us about navigating an era of confusing, social-media-driven health advice.Guests and hosts:Helen Pearson, author of “Beyond Belief” and a senior editor at NatureAlok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editorTopics covered:Evidence-based medicineClinical trialsArtificial intelligenceTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
  • Influencers v evidence-based medicine (part one)

    36:28|
    Many people turn to the internet for medical advice. But there’s a lot of misinformation out there. To help you think through the fog, over the next two weeks we’re bringing you two conversations about health, medicine, evidence and trust in the digital age. In the first episode, we diagnose the problem: how online influencers and AI diagnoses are turning people away from evidence-based advice. Guests and hosts:Deborah Cohen, author of “Bad Influence”Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editorTopics covered:Wellness trendsHealthcare technologyArtificial intelligenceTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
  • A tale of two outbreaks

    37:49|
    A rare disease spreading on a cruise ship triggered memories of covid-19. But while people worried about hantavirus cases reaching their shores, a much larger outbreak of Ebola took hold in central Africa. The two outbreaks have come in the wake of a series of worrying developments for international public health agencies: America has left the World Health Organisation and the country has also gutted its spending on international aid. How should pathogenic threats be handled in this post-aid era? Guests and hosts:Slavea Chankova, The Economist’s health-care correspondentNicole Tischler of Fundación Ciencia & Vida, ChileTom Geisbert of the University of Texas Medical BranchHost: Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor Topics covered:Andes hantavirusBundibugyo EbolavirusPandemic preparednessTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
  • Maths enters its AI era

    47:50|
    Not long ago, AI models struggled with basic arithmetic. Now, they’re solving complex mathematical conjectures. But researchers want to go further. They think AI could help them organise the mathematical literature into a common language—thereby finding connections between hitherto-disparate fields and, perhaps, even making completely new discoveries in one of the most fundamental areas of human inquiry.Guests and hosts:Anjani Trivedi, The Economist’s global business correspondentTerence Tao of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)Patrick Shafto of America’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)Maryna Viazovska of L'École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor Topics covered:MathematicsLarge language modelsAutoformalisationTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
  • Michael Pollan on the mystery of consciousness

    40:21|
    What is consciousness? It’s a question scientists have been struggling to answer for decades. Author Michael Pollan has been searching for scientific evidence that could unlock the mystery. His journey extends from humans to animals and even plants. But could consciousness ever exist in machines?Guests and hosts:Michael Pollan, author of “A World Appears”Host: Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor Topics covered:ConsciousnessSentienceNeural correlates of consciousnessTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
  • Why runners are getting faster

    37:54|
    Sporting history was made at this year’s London Marathon. Sabastian Sawe became the first man to finish a competitive race in less than two hours. How are elite athletes getting so much faster? We investigate how runners are harnessing the science of physiology and the technology of shoes to increase their speed. Plus, how anybody can train for a marathon—or just get fit fast.Guests and hosts: Ainslie Johnstone, The Economist’s data and science correspondentTim Cross, senior science writer and author of the “Well Informed” newsletterHost: Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editorTopics covered: London MarathonAdidas Adizero Adios Pro Evo 3Exercise hacksAudio and commentary taken from the BBC's live coverage of the London Marathon, April 26th 2026.Transcripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
  • Chernobyl: a laboratory like no other

    44:48|
    In the popular imagination, the Chernobyl nuclear-power plant sits in an abandoned, post-apocalyptic wasteland. In reality, the site of the world’s worst nuclear-energy disaster is a thriving experimentation ground for scientists studying the long-term impacts of radiation. This week, 40 years after the meltdown, we investigate what that laboratory has found so far. Guests and hosts: Jason Palmer, host of “The Intelligence” podcastOlena Pareniuk of the Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power PlantsJim Smith of the University of PortsmouthAlok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editorTopics covered: Chernobyl nuclear disasterNuclear safetyRadiation physicsTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
  • An antimatter road trip

    39:08|
    The universe—and everything inside it—shouldn’t exist. The big bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter, and their mutual annihilation should have resulted in nothing more than a sprawling ball of energy. But, in fact, the universe is dominated by matter, while antimatter is vanishingly rare. To try to understand why, physicists have taken antimatter on a road trip—for the first time in history.Guests and hosts: Sam Wikeley, The Economist’s science correspondentApril Cridland of CERN’s antimatter factoryStefan Ulmer of HHU Düsseldorf and CERN’s BASE experimentHost: Alok Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editorTopics covered: AntimatterThe European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN)Particle physicsTranscripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts.Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.