Share
No Sacred Cows
Let's Get Fiscal!
Following last week's episode with Ed Balls, former Treasury boss Nick Macpherson joins Sam and Ayesha to interrogate the economic environment facing the next government. We’re hearing a lot from Labour about economic security, fighting off the party’s reputation for ‘spendonomics’, but is the party being too far too cautious and harming its plans for growth?
If you've enjoyed this episode of The Power Test, why not become a Power Member on Substack to get the show ad-free and early? Subscribe here.
And don't forget to tune into The Debrief, the sister show of The Power Test, which airs live on X every Sunday at 7pm. Just go to The Power Test account on X.
Nick Macpherson on this week’s pod suggests maybe it is. The former Treasury boss says the party shouldn’t get “obsessed with fiscal rules”
Don’t get obsessed with fiscal rules, ex-Treasury boss warns Labour
A future Labour Government should borrow to invest and avoid being “too obsessed with fiscal rules”, says the former Treasury boss, Sir Nick McPherson, on this week’s The Power Test podcast with Ayesha Hazarika and Sam Freedman.
In a wide-ranging discussion about a future government transition and Labour’s economic plans, Sir Nick said:
Borrowing:
“My guess is Labour will, and so they should, borrow a bit more in order to invest. Providing that investment program is focused on what really matters and is then seen through I don't see that as a great problem in terms of the public finances. Indeed, some would argue that that Labour may be being too cautious.”
Labour’s fiscal plans:
“The case for being tough now is potentially it gives them room for manoeuvre. It gets them credit with the financial markets which, actually, is even more important today than it was in 1997 simply because the national debt is a whole lot higher and the interest rate bill required to service that debt is very high indeed.
“The other thing is, and this may surprise some people, I'm a relative optimist about the economy so I think the Labour inheritance may just be a little bit better than the OBR and others are suggesting. Real wages are rising, interest rates may come down this year which will help people with mortgages and so on, and we just may see more spending in the economy, the economy growing a bit more fast and rather more revenues coming in than expected. If I'm right, and you know I'm not always right, they may actually have rather more room for manoeuvre and so they may be able to stick with the fiscal plan whilst also spending a bit more.
“My guess is also they will have some tax increases up their sleeve of the sort which is consistent with the wider commitments not to raise the main rate, say, of National insurance and income tax.”
The £28 billion and fiscal rules:
“Did they have to drop the £28 billion commitment? In the end, £28 billion is not actually very much these days. It's about 1% of GDP. I mean, compared to the sorts of money Nigel Lawson gave away in 1988 this is chicken feed. But I can see in an uncertain world why they just want to be a bit cautious."
More episodes
View all episodes
5. The end of triangulation?
35:57||Season 2, Ep. 5As voters splinter between Reform, the Greens and an increasingly volatile centre ground, this week we examine what a winning centre-left politics might look like in an age where trust is collapsing, loyalties are weakening and delivery matters more than ever. If Labour wants a second term, our new Prime Minister, his team and the cabinet will have to stop the assumption that yesterday’s political truths will still work tomorrow.Labour faces a stark reality where it can no longer assume progressive voters have nowhere else to go. That competent government will eventually be rewarded. That careful triangulation can hold together an increasingly fragmented electorate. That if voters don’t understand what you’ve achieved, the problem is communication rather than strategy.It’s time for change and Andy Burnham’s accession to the premiership next week offers the opportunity. Better storytelling matters, but only if it is supported by a clear sense of purpose, coherent priorities and evidence of delivery. Burnham's perceived strengths - authenticity, political instinct, communication skills and a clearer sense of values - could help him reconnect with voters, but success will ultimately depend on whether he can demonstrate progress and convince the public that Labour has a credible long-term plan.The author of ThinkLabour’s latest research, Christabel Cooper, joins us to dig into the data behind Labour’s electoral challenges, examine why support has ebbed across multiple voter groups, and ask what a Burnham premiership might do differently - from economic insecurity and migration to political identity and electoral reform.4. A new political economy?
50:32||Season 2, Ep. 4As debate over the future direction of Labour in government gathers pace, this week we explore the growing disconnect between politics and economics, the collapse of the old social contract, and what a new political economy might look like. From devolution and housing to regulation, growth and the role of the state, this is a conversation about far more than individual policies. It’s about what kind of country Britain wants to become, who the economy should work for, and how progressives can respond to an era of stagnant living standards and rising anti-system politics. Fresh from his stint leading the Labour Growth Group Mark McVitie talks about the new economic settlement for Britain and we reflect on what these ideas mean for Labour’s next chapter and whether this long-overdue debate can finally produce the political strategy that the government has been missing.3. Britain's energy reality
41:40||Season 2, Ep. 3Can Britain achieve net zero without sacrificing energy security, economic growth and public support? As energy prices remain stubbornly high and global instability continues to expose vulnerabilities in energy markets, the debate is no longer just about climate change. It is about jobs, national resilience, living standards and Britain's place in a rapidly changing world.2. Time for nation building?
46:15||Season 2, Ep. 2This week, we ask whether Westminster is still fighting yesterday’s battles while the world moves on. Public First’s Jeegar Kakkad joins us to examine why defence and national security remain peripheral to political debate, despite growing global instability, as well as consider what a serious programme of national resilience might look like, and whether a new politics of nation building could offer an answer to both international insecurity and domestic stagnation.1. 19th Century institutions, 21st Century problems
55:21||Season 2, Ep. 1Is Britain’s political system is capable of responding to the economic, technological and cultural challenges reshaping not just the country, but the world? That’s the question Stella Creasy and Damian Hinds have been exploring together - and the one they join Ed, Anna, Mark and Ben to examine on this week’s episode of the pod - returning for our second season, at a huge time for Britain’s mainstream politics.12. Reshaping the state needs a real plan
45:39||Season 1, Ep. 12Political analyst, writer and former government adviser Sam Freedman steps into the cow shed this week to look at how Labour in the UK needs to continue to realise that competence and good intentions will be enough to change the state. He lays out how some criticisms from the political right about state inefficiency are valid and need engaging with and how the government must move on from naivety towards a real plan on reshaping the state, if it wants to deliver. Sam talks about decentralisation away from Westminster as a potential remedy the government should pick up - as well as boosting the Prime Minister’s office and creating stronger ministerial offices. We also hear from Sam, and reader Katy, about our last episode on progressive education, which got the comments section livened up.11. Let's not go backwards on education
38:15||Season 1, Ep. 11‘Progressive Education’ - the idea that education must be authentic, child-led, and discovery-oriented - actually leads to regressive outcomes for children and society. To secure progressive outcomes for kids and the future of our country’s, Kristopher Boulton and Daisy Christodoulou join the herd and lay out how the left is going to have to let go of some of its fallacies about the classroom and, most importantly, not allow ideas of the past take us backwards going into the future. Join us now for this special listener-submitted episode of No Sacred Cows - looking at the politics of and future of education, alongside a collection of tales from the classroom and lessons we can all learn about making schools work for kids and our society.10. Dump Trump
39:43||Season 1, Ep. 10It’s time Keir Starmer dumps Trump - for the interests of the UK as well as his own and the Labour Party’s political skin.9. Oh baby
42:28||Season 1, Ep. 9The populist right is railing loudly against the decline in birthrates in the US and the UK - not always out of sincerity, and often with overtly racist reasoning. As a result the left has buried its head in the sand and refused to go near the issue. But there is no reason, Anna McShane from the New Britain Project argues, to do so.