On Opinion

Share

Generational Politics, with Bobby Duffy

Season 2, Ep. 27

S2 E27: Generational Politics

“If you truly understand what’s different between generations, you have a much better idea of what’s coming up in the future.”

It turns out there are very real differences between the generations. Key external events - a world war, a crippling global financial crash, 9⁄11, or even a pandemic - will mark a generation in a way that differentiates them from previous or later ones.

But there are also slower cultural and technological differences that also make their mark: consider the dwindling role of religion across the West over 4 generations, or the impact of smart phones on the way we all think.

”The concept of the Generation is the most important one… because it is how history moves, changes, wheels and flows” - Ortega y Gasset

Bobby Duffy has written the book on generational differences, and here explains what brings us together and splits us apart - from our attitudes to sex, money and moral values to the way we think of driving or home-ownership.

“Because we’re so deeply connected, looking at things generationally is really important to us because we want each generation after us to do better”

Listen to Bobby discuss:

  • How to go about defining generations
  • How we get our stereotypes right and wrong
  • Why Gen Z are in a ‘sex recession’
  • Why Gen X are so miserable
  • Whether the Baby Boomers really did have it so much easier
  • Whether there is space for the ‘individual’ in a demographic analysis of culture and personality
  • The 3 Key drivers of attitudinal change
  • And why we all live 200 years…

Read the Full Transcript

Bobby Duffy

Bobby Duffy is Professor of Public Policy and Director of the Policy Institute. He has worked across most public policy areas in his career of nearly 30 years in policy research and evaluation, including being seconded to the Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. He is the author of Generations - Does when you’re born shape who you are?


More on this episode

Learn all about On Opinion

Meet Turi Munthehttps://twitter.com/turi

Learn more about the Parlia project here

And visit us at: https://www.parlia.com

More Episodes

9/21/2021

Political Predisposition, with John Hibbing

Season 2, Ep. 26
S2 E26: Political Predisposition“40% of the variance observed in political attitudes can be attributed to genetics”Twin studies have suggested that one third of our political orientation can be traced to our genes. But does that mean our politics are predisposed?John Hibbing is one of the greats of Political Psychology in the US. His work spans decades and has broken ground across multiple disciplines - from polling and representation, to the biology of political differences. John believes that knowledge of of this genetic influence can help us better understand each other.“Predispositions are not destiny, but defaults - defaults that can be and frequently are overridden.”Conservatives and Liberals evolved clear and distinct bedrock values deep in our collective past. Our views of the outsider, our perception of threat, our concern for order may be as innate to us as our sense of taste or our personality traits.“Politics is universal; it’s human nature that varies”Recognising how our values differ, and the reasons why we have such different perspectives on what makes for a just and good society is fundamental to the democratic project. Because ultimately, we need both Left and Right to survive.Listen to John discuss:How taste and politics are linkedThe core values of conservatism and liberalismWhy Left and Right are universal across culture and historywhether there is a ‘Liberal’ GeneWhy Nature vs Nurture is a meaningless questionHow to talk to the other sideRead theFull TranscriptJohn HibbingJohn Hibbing is an American political scientist and Foundation Regents University Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He is known for his research on the biological and psychological correlates of political ideology. He is the author ofPredisposed: Liberals, Conservatives and the Biology of Political DifferencesMore on this episodeLearn all aboutOn OpinionMeetTuri Munthe:https://twitter.com/turiLearn more about the Parlia project hereAnd visit us at:https://www.parlia.com
6/30/2021

Emotional Politics, with Omar Kholeif and Jonathan Sklar

Season 2, Ep. 25
S2 E25: On Emotion“The world that we live in today is fuelled by heightened emotion…”Over the course of these two seasons of On Opinion, we’ve looked at opinions through the lens of philosophy, psychology, social science, anthropology and evolution. But one area we’ve missed is that of feeling.Omar Kholeif and Jonathan Sklar take very different approaches to understand the world we live in, but both see emotion as something that can affect individualsandcollective groups.Jonathan feels that you can transpose psychoanalysis, which is designed for the individual, to a culture and a moment in history. Omar is convinced not only that ‘ages’ have emotions, dominant leitmotifs of feeling that impact everyone around them, but also that today is a particularly emotional age - that our feelings are closer to the surface.Listen to Turi speak to Jonathan and Omar about:How we define ‘ages’The difference between the Arab Spring and Black Lives Matter protestsWhether we need to ‘fix’ an age of anxietyThe rise of hatred across the WestHow psychoanalysis can heal emotional wounds of traumaThe importance of mourning“There’s a considerable rise in anxiety and tension and people hating other people, and there’s far less debate going on…”Works cited include:William Reddy’sEmotional RegimesWill Davies onNervous StatesRead theFull TranscriptOmar KholeifOmar is a writer, curator, and cultural historian, and is Director of Collections and Senior Curator at Sharjah Art Foundation, Government of Sharjah, UAE. Trained as a political scientist, Kholeif’s career began as a journalist and documentary filmmaker before entering into the picture palace of museums. Concerned with the intersections of emerging technologies with post-colonial, and critical race theory, Kholeif’s research has explored histories of performance art; the visual experience of mental illness; the interstices of social justice, as well as the aesthetics of digital culture.Jonathan SklarJonathan trained in medicine at the Royal Free, University of London in 1973, and then trained in psychoanalytic psychotherapy in the Adult Department, Tavistock Centre for four years with adults, children and adolescents. At the same time he trained at the Institute of Psychoanalysis and has been a psychoanalyst since 1983 and a training analyst since 1996. He is chair of The Independent Psychoanalysis Trust.On Opinion is a member ofThe Democracy Group, a network of podcasts that examines what’s broken in our democracy and how we can work together to fix it.Produced by Emma PenneyMore on this episodeLearn all aboutOn OpinionMeetTuri Munthe:https://twitter.com/turiLearn more about the Parlia project here:https://www.parlia.com/aboutAnd visit us at:https://www.parlia.com
6/23/2021

The Journal of Controversial Ideas, with Francesca Minerva

Season 2, Ep. 24
S2 E24: The Journal of Controversial Ideas“You can’t have a good education if you’re not exposed to ideas you don’t agree with”Twelve years ago, Francesca Minerva published anacademic articlein the Journal of Medical Ethics giving a moral defence of infanticide. She was overwhelmed by the reaction she received - for an academic article in the early days of Twitter and Facebook, it went ‘viral’. She received death threats from the public, academics refusing to shake her hand, and she found it hard to get tenure. But she says that she was lucky. If the same thing happened today, she’d be a lot worse off than a few disgruntled colleagues.Francesca is one of the co-founders of theJournal of Controversial Ideas, alongside Peter Singer and Jeff McMahan. Their aim is to promote free inquiry on controversial topics, in the face of what they see as increasing censorship across the academy.“It has become really common for academics to sign petitions to get somebody they disagree with fired or demoted…”Francesca worries that without the capacity to discuss or challenge widely held views, our search for the truth will fall flat. She worries that the very idea of academic enquiry is changing: that truth is ‘constructed’ rather than ‘discovered’.“I don’t know if university as we know it is going to survive.”Works cited include:Jon Haidt andThe Coddling of the American MindRonald Dworkinon TruthRead theFull TranscriptFrancesca MinervaFrancesca Minerva is a research fellow at the University of Milan. Between 2011 and 2020 she has worked as a post-doc at the University of Melbourne, at the University of Ghent, and at Warwick University. She is the co-founder and co-editor of theJournal of Controversial Ideas. Her research focuses on applied ethics, including lookism, conscientious objection, abortion, academic freedom, and cryonics.On Opinion is a member ofThe Democracy Group, a network of podcasts that examines what’s broken in our democracy and how we can work together to fix it.More on this episodeLearn all aboutOn OpinionMeetTuri Munthe:https://twitter.com/turiLearn more about the Parlia project here:https://www.parlia.com/aboutAnd visit us at:https://www.parlia.com