Share
The Global Gambit
Turkey Could Be Entering the Nuclear Arms Race | Gönül Tol
•
Russia’s war in Ukraine has done more than redraw Europe’s security map. It has exposed the limits of military alliances—and triggered a potentially dangerous chain reaction far beyond the battlefield.
For Turkey, the choice is not simply between Vladimir Putin and NATO. Ankara is maintaining its relationship with Moscow, strengthening its position inside the Western alliance and reducing its dependence on Russia, all while seeking greater freedom to act alone. That pursuit of “strategic autonomy” may now extend to the nuclear question.
Turkey expert Gönül Tol joins Pyotr Kurzin to explain Erdoğan’s carefully calibrated strategy. They discuss how Ukraine changed Ankara’s relationship with Russia; why Turkey has avoided fully choosing sides; its efforts to diversify its energy supplies; and how the Iran war and declining confidence in American security guarantees are reshaping Turkish thinking.
Is Turkey actually preparing to build a nuclear weapon—or merely creating the capacity to keep that option open? And what would its choices mean for NATO, Russia, the Middle East and the future of nuclear proliferation?
Gönül Tol is a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute and the author of Erdoğan’s War: A Strongman’s Struggle at Home and in Syria. Her new report is here: https://mei.edu/publication/turkeys-nuclear-ambitions-in-the-post-iran-war-environment/
Subscribe to SubstackRead as well as listen as l overthink for you: https://substack.com/@pyotrskurzin
- X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PKurzin
- YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7-TPqKMViddKZeo4K2P2jg/
- Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/theglobalgambit
- Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/theglobalgambit
Leave a quick rating—it's free, easy, and honestly, the least you can do after I've blessed your ears with such wisdom. Where would you be without me?
More episodes
View all episodes
Trump’s Fight for Survival Is Becoming America’s Greatest Danger | Robert Pape
57:57|Donald Trump’s war with Iran is colliding with a growing political struggle at home. With the midterms approaching, the prospect of electoral defeat could increase the temptation to escalate abroad — even as Iran seeks to turn economic disruption and regional instability into leverage against Washington.But Professor Robert Pape warns that the greatest danger may come after the votes are cast. He argues that the period between November’s elections and the seating of a new Congress could create a particularly volatile combination of military escalation, political violence and attempts to expand presidential power.In this conversation, Pape explains how an initially successful American ground operation could become a prolonged military trap, why Iran could respond more aggressively to renewed attacks, and what reported threats against US diplomats could signal about the next phase of the conflict. He also examines the pressures on global oil supplies, whether a change of leadership in Israel could alter the trajectory towards war, and why the interaction between foreign conflict and domestic political turmoil poses such a serious test for American democracy.Robert Pape is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago and a leading scholar of air power, political violence and international security. He writes The Escalation Trap, examining the dynamics driving the conflict with Iran.Trump’s Ego Is Putin’s Strongest Asset | Tina Fordham
54:08|Weeks after signing a sweeping sanctions law against Russia’s energy revenues, Donald Trump has struck a deal to buy Russian diesel, announced while his envoys sat down with Ukrainian officials to discuss ending the war. Trump calls it a win. In Moscow, it looks like something else entirely.In this conversation, I’m joined by Tina Fordham, geostrategist, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, and Wall Street’s original chief global political analyst during seventeen years at Citi, who previously built Eurasia Group’s financial markets research business. We examine why Trump keeps offering deals that Putin never takes, why Putin puts power ahead of any commercial offer, and why the man many in the West mistook for a pragmatist is driven by ideology and legacy. We also look at how the Iran war, launched to project American strength, has left Washington weaker and Trump facing the midterms with soaring prices.We also discuss Putin’s Valdai remarks and nuclear sabre-rattling over Kaliningrad, what happens to Russia after Putin, why China is quietly waiting for Russian decline, why markets keep shrugging off geopolitical shocks, her research showing geopolitical risk has tripled since 2010, and why the world feels worse than ever when by most measures it isn’t. Tina’s latest book is Mad World: A Geostrategy Survival Guide for Leaders: https://link.amazon/B0h8xEhwsPutin Has Trapped Himself in a War He Cannot Win | Lawrence Freedman
41:07|Ukraine has transformed Russia’s vast geography from a source of strategic depth into a growing vulnerability. Its long-range drones are striking oil refineries, supply lines and military infrastructure, while Crimea is becoming increasingly difficult for Moscow to defend and sustain.But Sir Lawrence Freedman warns against assuming that Russia’s mounting failures have made Ukraine’s position easy. Ukrainian civilians face another punishing winter, ballistic missiles remain an acute threat, and Vladimir Putin continues to resist any settlement that could be interpreted as weakness.In this conversation, Freedman explains why Putin has boxed himself in, whether Russia can find enough soldiers to sustain the war, how Ukraine remains ahead in the rapidly evolving drone contest, and why the next six months could prove decisive. He also examines the economic pressures building inside Russia, the amateurism of Washington’s negotiating effort, NATO’s struggle to catch up with Ukrainian innovation, and whether Putin will eventually be forced to confront the futility of his war.Sir Lawrence Freedman is Emeritus Professor of War Studies at King’s College London and one of the world’s foremost authorities on strategy, conflict and military history.Putin Is Already at War With Europe | General Ben Hodges
37:43|General Ben Hodges says Russia is already at war with Europe. Not with missiles striking NATO cities, but through drones, sabotage and attacks designed to frighten populations and weaken support for Ukraine. So why are European governments still reluctant to impose meaningful consequences?Hodges joins me to discuss Germany’s far-right breakthrough, NATO’s response to Russian provocations and the growing uncertainty over American support. We also examine how Ukraine’s long-range strikes are turning Russia’s vast territory from a strategic advantage into a vulnerability—and why Putin faces a dangerous choice over mobilisation as winter approaches.Ben Hodges is the former Commanding General of US Army Europe.Iran and Ukraine Have Changed Everything We Know About War | David Petraeus
54:15|Iran has been militarily devastated — and yet, six months on, it may be winning. General David Petraeus argues that Tehran's control of the Strait of Hormuz has become a "weapon of mass disruption" more powerful than the nuclear program the war was meant to destroy.In this conversation, I'm joined by General David Petraeus — former CENTCOM and NATO commander, former CIA Director, and Chairman of the KKR Global Institute — to examine why Iran's strategy may be succeeding despite its military weakness, why Ukraine's drone war represents a genuine revolution that Western militaries have failed to adapt to, and why Petraeus believes the US and UK urgently need revolutionary, not evolutionary, institutional military reform.We also discuss Russia's deepening economic collapse, the vulnerability of manned military platforms in modern warfare, escalating Russian sabotage against NATO states, and why Petraeus believes nuclear escalation from Putin remains unlikely despite the rhetoric.If war has already changed as fundamentally as Petraeus suggests, the deciding question isn't who has the better weapons — it's who adapts to the new war fast enough to survive it.Secrets, Mysteries, and Spies: A Former CIA Officer on Predicting Russia
36:57|Description:Intelligence failures make headlines. Intelligence successes rarely do — which is exactly the problem when trying to understand how the West actually predicted Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and what it can and can't tell us about Putin's next move.In this conversation, I'm joined by Charles Finfrock — a former CIA officer with 18 years of experience across the Middle East, Europe, and Asia — to examine how intelligence assessments are actually built. Why there's a critical difference between a "secret" that can be stolen and a "mystery" that even Putin himself may not have resolved, how human sources, satellite imagery, and signals intelligence get fused into a single judgment, and why getting Russia's 2022 invasion right was a genuine intelligence success even if it couldn't prevent the war.We also discuss Russia's escalating willingness to target Western and dual citizens on NATO soil, Ukraine's campaign against Russian commanders and energy infrastructure, and the historical pattern behind strategic surprise — from Stalin's refusal to believe Sorge's warnings to October 7th.If Russia is preparing for another confrontation, the intelligence may already be there. The harder question is whether anyone is willing to believe it.Trump's Iran War Was Meant to Break the Regime. It Broke America's Middle East Instead
42:37|Summary Iran's regime survives. The Strait of Hormuz is under threat. Gulf allies are furious. And the United States, further from its goals than when the war began, has spent months exposing the limits of its own power in the process. Jason Campbell, joins The Global Gambit to break down how Trump's Iran war became a self-inflicted collapse of American leverage in the Middle East: the depleted munitions stocks, the abandoned Gulf partners, the diplomatic sidelining on the Strait of Hormuz talks, and why China may be the war's quietest long-term winner.About the guestJason Campbell is a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute focusing on US foreign policy, defense strategy, and Middle East security, and spent fifteen years at the RAND Corporation.Will China Annex Siberia? General H.R. McMaster on the Real Threat to Russia
46:21|Description:Former US National Security Advisor Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster joins The Global Gambit to examine why China, Russia and Iran have become the defining geopolitical challenge of our time. We discuss Beijing's support for Moscow, the changing character of warfare, NATO's future, Western fatigue over Ukraine, and why China may ultimately be the greatest long-term beneficiary of today's global instability — including whether Beijing's ambitions extend to annexing Russian territory in Siberia, and what the axis means for Taiwan and the wider Indo-Pacific.About the guestLieutenant General H.R. McMaster served as the 26th US National Security Advisor and is one of America's leading military strategists and experts on great-power competition.Timestamps00:00 – Introduction and General McMaster's background01:01 – Initial developments in Ukraine and Middle East tensions02:19 – China, Russia and Iran's strategic partnership03:33 – The evolving character of warfare with drones and space06:19 – Historical parallels: World War I and modern warfare07:31 – Limitations of the Russia-Iran-China axis09:05 – Western fatigue and the Russian war in Ukraine10:28 – China and Russia's role in global power shifts11:30 – Weaknesses of the axis powers and future prospects14:27 – The Russia-Ukraine conflict and Western support17:47 – China's military and economic standing18:47 – NATO's future without US support20:42 – Chinese economic power and global influence36:36 – Russia's future in the context of Chinese expansion38:19 – The outlook for Ukraine and Middle East conflicts41:17 – The long war against Iran and regional stability44:13 – Closing remarks and optimism for democracy