Legal AI LAb

Microsoft is not trying to win the legal AI market. It wants to be the layer underneath it.Dervish Tayyip is Assistant General Counsel for EMEA at Microsoft. The strategy he describes has little to do with building the best model. Embed intelligence into the workflows lawyers already use, then wrap enterprise governance around it. The legal agent inside Word is the visible part. The orchestration layer, where a lawyer pulls down whichever model suits the task, is where Tayyip says legal AI value actually sits.For general counsel the pressure is coming from somewhere else entirely. CFOs have heard that legal is about to be disrupted. Management consultants are telling the CEO they can deliver the same legal department at a third of the cost. Tayyip explains what he hears in Microsoft's roundtables with general counsel, and how a GC takes control of that narrative before someone else writes it for them.He also covers where horizontal platforms end and jurisdiction specific legal AI begins, what Microsoft commits to if a government ever demands a shutdown, and what junior lawyers should be learning now the groundwork is automated.You'll learnwhy Microsoft says the frontier model is not where legal AI value sitshow the legal agent inside Word removes the friction of changing behaviourwhat enterprise governance adds on top of a model: confidentiality, auditability, privilegehow a general counsel builds the investment case when the CFO wants headcount downwhy horizontal platforms and vertical legal AI are no longer an either or choicewhat Microsoft commits to contractually if a government demands a shutdownPowered by ZenoThis episode is powered by Zeno. Zeno is an AI native legal workspace built for Dutch and EU law.Its AI navigates law like a human legal professional. Secure, transparent and grounded in authoritative sources.Visit zeno.law and make deep thinking your competitive edge.Chapters00:00 Introduction02:18 Why the legal profession adapts slower than technology10:39 Automate, innovate or eliminate your workflows14:14 The legal agent in Word and an operating system for legal work17:11 Why the model is not where legal AI value sits22:39 Competing and partnering in the legal AI market25:56 Inside Microsoft's roundtables with general counsel29:59 What if someone pulls the plug on Europe33:48 200 data centres and Microsoft's promise to Europe43:10 The general counsel's case to the CFO46:30 Where horizontal and vertical legal AI meet52:43 How junior lawyers learn when the groundwork is gone58:23 Efficiency versus effectiveness

AI is not neutral. The gender gap in AI runs through the data it is trained on, the people who build it and the people who use it. And in legal, almost nobody talks about it.Nicky Leijtens, co-founder of She Breaks the Law and part of Bird & Bird, joins Hidde Bruinsma with examples that stick. Ask ChatGPT for career advice as a girl and the answer is less encouraging than the one a boy gets. Women make up 22% of AI development teams, a number that has not moved in ten years of Stanford research. At the M&A Awards, 42 nominations included exactly one woman.Why does the gender gap in AI stay off the agenda while every conference talks adoption and implementation? And what can you do tomorrow, whether you build, buy or simply use legal AI?Powered by ZenoThis episode is powered by Zeno. Zeno is an AI native legal workspace built for Dutch and EU law.Its AI navigates law like a human legal professional. Secure, transparent and grounded in authoritative sources.Visit zeno.law and make deep thinking your competitive edge.You'll learnwhy AI reflects the people who build it, and who is missing from that roomwhat happens when biased models start influencing legal decisions and access to justicehow visibility creates permission for other women to experimentwhy women adopt AI less and are judged more harshly when they do use itwhat closes the gender gap in AI according to Nicky: small actions that add upChapters00:00 Introduction00:05 She Breaks the Law: 4,000 women in 50 countries07:43 Rechtwijzer and better justice journeys13:51 The gender gap in AI nobody talks about14:39 AI is not neutral: data, users, builders16:39 Airbags, heart attacks and the male default18:08 Only 22% of AI builders are women20:25 Closing the gender gap in AI: where to start25:30 The Rik de Groot moment at Legal Geek29:14 Zeno question: auditing legal AI tools for bias34:27 42 nominations, one woman at the M&A Awards42:54 Antibodies: who is blocking the change50:39 What you can do tomorrow about the gender gap in AI

Personal branding is career insurance for lawyers. That is how George Hannah treats it, and it is paying off.George is a solicitor apprentice at Lewis Silkin and the founder of Best Practice, the legal AI newsletter he started in January 2025 with one viral LinkedIn post. Today it is a media company with a podcast and a personal brand of more than 12,000 LinkedIn followers, run entirely next to his day job.We get into his personal branding playbook: why perfectionism keeps lawyers invisible, why an email list beats a rented audience, and why he posts at 80 percent and walks away. Then the legal AI market: Jude Law fronting Legora, Gabriel Macht fronting Harvey, Claude for Legal, the Freshfields deal and the Gartner hype cycle.And the question every firm is wrestling with: what is left for junior lawyers when AI does the grunt work? George's answer: build the agents.Powered by ZenoThis episode is powered by Zeno. Zeno is an AI native legal workspace built for Dutch and EU law.Its AI navigates law like a human legal professional. Secure, transparent and grounded in authoritative sources.Visit zeno.law and make deep thinking your competitive edge.You'll learnwhy a personal brand works as career insurancehow one viral post grew into a legal media companywhy perfectionism keeps lawyers invisible on LinkedInwhat the celebrity brand war says about the legal AI marketwhether legal AI has reached the peak of the hype cyclehow junior lawyers stay valuable by building AI agentsChapters00:00 Introduction02:21 One viral post starts Best Practice04:49 Email lists and the discipline of weekly content08:09 From Sunday newsletter to legal media company11:19 Personal branding is not luck12:22 Why lawyers fail at personal branding16:03 Personal branding in the age of AI slop18:07 Your personal brand as career insurance22:01 The TBD Marketing LinkedIn leaderboard23:39 Post at 80 percent and put your phone away26:06 Jude Law, Gabriel Macht and the legal AI brand war28:58 Have we reached the peak of the hype cycle30:30 Claude for Legal, Microsoft and the Freshfields deal35:47 Access to justice and Lawhive's AI lawyer Lawrence40:32 What junior lawyers do when AI takes the grunt work47:08 Portfolio careers and weekly check-ins50:50 Advice for lawyers finding their voice

A banking lawyer at one of the world's largest law firms teaches herself Python on weekends. She builds an AI-powered billing tool in a Jupyter notebook. Months later, that tool is rolled out across the entire firm.Tanya Sadoughi is Linklaters' AI and Innovation Lead Lawyer for Global Banking. When ChatGPT launched one month into her innovation secondment, she saw the opportunity before most others did. She talked to every lawyer in the banking practice, mapped every pain point, and built a working prototype herself.That prototype became the WIP Summariser, now deployed firmwide. Today she leads a team of five AI lawyers inside a global network of twenty.Vibe coding is changing how lawyers work. Not by replacing them, but by turning them into builders. Tanya explains what that looks like inside a major international law firm. From hackathons that spark curiosity to agentic systems that solve problems at scale.You'll learnWhy the AI lawyer role should always be filled internallyHow a weekend prototype became an enterprise tool at LinklatersWhat vibecoding means for the legal professionWhy hackathons are the best way to spark AI curiosity at law firmsHow Linklaters scaled from one to twenty AI lawyersWhat lawyers and engineers can learn from each otherPowered by ZenoThis episode is powered by Zeno. Zeno is an AI native legal workspace built for Dutch and EU law.Its AI navigates law like a human legal professional. Secure, transparent and grounded in authoritative sources.Visit zeno.law and make deep thinking your competitive edge.Chapters0:00 Introduction2:04 Will lawyers become builders4:53 Growing up in a pizza shop in South Yorkshire9:17 A viral YouTube channel at 1511:16 Why she chose law13:29 Becoming a banking lawyer at Linklaters15:42 The itch for something different17:35 ChatGPT launches one month into her innovation role19:28 First experiments with large language models23:18 The billing problem nobody could solve27:26 Learning Python on weekends31:31 The moment the prototype worked35:31 Hackathons and sparking curiosity at law firms40:23 From one AI lawyer to twenty43:47 Vibecoding five apps in one week46:31 What engineers and lawyers can learn from each other51:23 Why every law firm needs an AI lawyer53:01 More builders not more tools

Lawyers are architects of society. But what happens when AI changes how law is accessed, practiced and understood?In this episode of Legal AI Lab, Soledad Atienza, Dean of IE Law School, explains why legal education must move beyond national systems and embrace a global legal mindset.AI makes legal knowledge more accessible than ever. That means law schools must shift their focus. From memorising content to developing critical thinking. From national silos to comparative principles. From narrow specialisation to multidisciplinary awareness.We discuss:• Why law schools should not ban AI but guide its use• How assessments must change in an AI world• Why students must learn to question AI outputs• Why demand for legal services is growing, not shrinking• The importance of human skills such as empathy, negotiation and teamworkPowered by ZenoThis episode is powered by Zeno. Zeno is an AI native legal workspace built for Dutch and EU law.Its AI navigates law like a human legal professional. Secure, transparent and grounded in authoritative sources.Visit zeno.law and make deep thinking your competitive edge.hoofdstukken00:00 Lawyers as architects of society02:47 National regulation vs global practice06:18 From systems to principles09:42 Knowledge vs judgment in the AI era14:11 Growing demand for legal services17:36 Embedding AI across the curriculum22:04 Teaching students to question AI26:53 Rethinking assessment in an AI world32:27 Generalists and multidisciplinary thinking37:12 Human skills in a tech driven profession41:05 Experiential learning and VR44:38 Habits future lawyers must build

AI verandert de advocatuur fundamenteel. Niet alleen technisch, maar ook cultureel.In deze aflevering van Legal AI Lab spreekt Hidde Bruinsma met Elgar Weijtmans over wat het betekent om jurist te zijn in een tijdperk van generatieve AI.Elgar vertelt waarom hij zichzelf een generalist noemt. Waarom juist die brede blik steeds waardevoller wordt. En waarom advocatenkantoren die wachten op perfect beleid of volledige zekerheid zichzelf in de weg zitten.Het gesprek gaat over experimenteren. Over kleine teams. Over sandboxes in plaats van olietankers. En over waarom training, cultuur en menselijk gedrag uiteindelijk belangrijker zijn dan de technologie zelf.Ook bespreken we hoe advocatenkantoren omgaan met weerstand. Waarom vroege adoptie soms vooral geluk is. En waarom AI niet vraagt om minder mensen, maar om andere vaardigheden.Een aflevering voor studenten. Voor jonge juristen. Voor partners. En voor iedereen die voelt dat het klassieke carrièrepad schuurt.Powered by ZenoThis episode is powered by Zeno. Zeno is an AI native legal workspace built for Dutch and EU law.Its AI navigates law like a human legal professional. Secure, transparent and grounded in authoritative sources.Visit zeno.law and make deep thinking your competitive edge.hoofdstukken0:00 Introductie en het pad van Elgar1:10 Generalist zijn in de advocatuur2:59 Waarom AI een kans is voor generalisten4:14 Het klassieke carrièrepad onder druk6:08 Waarom experimenteren essentieel is9:20 De eerste kennismaking met ChatGPT11:28 Verandering organiseren binnen een groot kantoor13:52 Waarom timing soms geluk is15:15 Training is belangrijker dan technologie18:56 Worden advocatenkantoren techbedrijven21:53 Een nieuw profiel voor jonge juristen24:40 Zichtbaarheid. Kennis delen. Cultuur27:23 Waarom hyperpersoonlijk werkt30:48 De zoektocht naar juridische AI tools33:24 De trechter. Niet het resultaat maar het proces36:24 Waarom testen altijd contextafhankelijk is40:23 Van generieke AI naar juridisch onderzoek45:22 Richtlijnen en onzekerheid in de markt48:52 Open benchmarks en samenwerking51:44 Voorspellingen voor 202654:31 Advies aan jonge juristen55:55 Afsluiting

Banning AI at law schools will not save legal education. It will make it unfair.In this episode of Legal AI Lab, Hidde Bruinsma speaks with Thibault Schrepel, Associate Professor of Law at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and founder of Stanford’s Computational Antitrust Project.Schrepel explains why banning AI creates distorted competition, why AI detection does not work, and why law schools must rethink how they teach and assess students instead of trying to preserve outdated systems.Based on a two year classroom experiment, he shows what happens when students use AI without guidance, with guidance, or not at all. The results challenge common fears about shortcuts and show why AI can strengthen learning when used deliberately.The conversation also dives into the limits of future proof regulation, the challenges of the EU AI Act, and how AI is already changing law firm business models, billing structures, and the role of junior lawyers.AI is not ending the legal profession. It is removing the most tedious work and increasing the value of human judgment, creativity, and strategy.It forces legal education to confront how lawyers actually create value.You’ll learn• Why banning AI in law schools creates inequality rather than fairness• What actually happens when students use AI in legal education• Why detecting AI generated work does not work at scale• How legal education must change exams and teaching methods• Why future proof regulation is impossible and adaptive law is necessary• How the EU AI Act struggles with fast technological change• Why hourly billing is under pressureFollow and subscribe, leave a review, and share this episode with colleagues and friends.Powered by ZenoThis episode is powered by Zeno. Zeno is an AI native legal workspace built for Dutch and EU law.Its AI navigates law like a human legal professional. Secure, transparent and grounded in authoritative sources.Visit zeno.law and make deep thinking your competitive edge.Chapters0:00 Introduction.3:05 Fear, prohibition and the illusion of control7:40 There is no hiding from AI in legal practice12:20 What really goes wrong when lawyers misuse AI17:30 AI does not replace reasoning. It exposes weak reasoning22:45 Judges, responsibility and meaningful human control28:30 Why AI literacy matters more than technical skill33:50 New legal markets beyond traditional law firms38:40 Why old billing models are under pressure43:10 The EU AI Act. Guardrails, risk categories and legal responsibility47:40 What the AI Act means for lawyers, judges and legal education50:10 Final reflection. Regulation as a condition for trust

AI verandert de rechtspraak sneller dan wie dan ook had verwacht.In deze aflevering spreekt Hidde Bruinsma met Jos Smits, Programmamanager AI bij de Rechtspraak, over deepfakes, bewijsproblemen, hallucinerende modellen en de ontwikkeling van RechtspraakGPT.Jos legt uit waarom klassieke ideeën over bewijs en waarheidsvinding niet langer houdbaar zijn in een tijdperk waarin beelden, stemmen en documenten volledig te vervalsen zijn. En waarom AI niet de rechter vervangt, maar wel de manier waarop rechters werken ingrijpend zal veranderen.Je hoort onder meer:• Hoe deepfakes het bewijsrecht fundamenteel uitdagen• Waarom AI soms de bewijslast juist omdraait• Wat RechtspraakGPT wel en niet zal kunnen• Hoe de rechtspraak verantwoord met LLMs wil werken• Waarom menselijke oordeelsvorming belangrijker wordt in een AI-wereldDeze aflevering is onmisbaar voor iedereen die nadenkt over de toekomst van recht, waarheidsvinding en technologie.Follow and subscribe, leave a review, and share this episode with colleagues and friends.Powered by ZenoThis episode is powered by Zeno. Zeno is an AI native legal workspace built for Dutch and EU law.Its AI navigates law like a human legal professional. Secure, transparent and grounded in authoritative sources.Visit zeno.law and make deep thinking your competitive edge.