Share

cover art for 274: Applying Leadership and the Environment in corporations

This Sustainable Life

274: Applying Leadership and the Environment in corporations

Ep. 274

This episode describes how I train corporate and institutional leaders in environmental leadership.


Here are the notes I read from:

  • Talking with more and more corporations lately, describing how I work with them
  • Putting it here for easy reference
  • You'll see among podcast guests many corporate and institutional people
  • Lorna Davis of Danone C-Suite
  • Dominic Barton 3-time Global Managing Director of McKinsey
  • Beth Comstock, former CMO of GE (when Fortune 5), on Board of Nike
  • Bob Langert, former Head of CSO at McDonalds
  • Vincent Stanley, Director of Patagonia, where he's worked since 1973 and professor at Yale School of Management
  • Tensie Whelan, Director of NYU-Stern's Center for Sustainability and Business, former President of Rainforest Alliance
  • Col. Everett Spain, West Point's Head of Leadership
  • Col. Mark Read, West Point's Head of Geologic Engineering
  • Marine Corp 3-star General Paul Van Riper
  • Michael Werner, Google's Lead for Circular Economy, formerly similar role at Apple
  • Gave two talks in 2019 at Google, another at Citi and other banks, IBM, Boston Consulting Group, Coca-Cola, Lululemon
  • John Lee Dumas, entrepreneur
  • Dov Baron, leadership guru
  • Marshall Goldsmith, Dorie Clark, Alisa Cohn, #1 coaches
  • Behind the scenes, developed a lot with coaching clients at McKinsey, Exxon-Mobil, Columbia Business School
  • Guest on MAGAmedia.org, a staunchly pro-Trump site, which talked about me supportively on 3 consecutive episodes
  • Very business friendly because business can benefit from this
  • Most common response is: I thought it would cost money or take time but it saves money and time.
  • Most of all for the executives I work with, it replaces not knowing what to do when you have to act but fearing being called greenwashing or hypocritical
  • for the company, it boosts morale and gives a competitive advantage. Think of how Patagonia can charge a premium.

Context: most companies hear demand from customers, employees, shareholders, and media to be more sustainable.

  • Almost necessary for top talent. Patagonia doesn't have to advertise new positions. Exxon has to pay top dollar
  • Just today I talked to a guy who runs a business Exxon wanted to hire. He quoted them a high price because he didn't want to work with
  • them.
  • Action usually comes from junior employees. They're younger and face more of their lives with potential catastrophe and they've invested
  • less in old ways
  • Easy to think senior decision-makers can just change, after all everything points to acting
  • Decision-makers are often most vulnerable
  • We've all heard people and organizations called greenwashing and hypocritical
  • However well-meaning, accusations make choice for executives easier not to act and risk losing job or company value, even if they want to
  • act
  • They think they have to be perfect, an impossibly high bar
  • They only have to show they are doing their best, a lower bar, but they have to show they are doing it genuinely and authentically.
  •  
  • I enable this, as you can hear from the conversations with the executives I mentioned
  • For example, Yvon Chouinard of Patagonia behaves far from perfectly, but he hides nothing. As a result, people support him for his flaws
  • instead of attack, because they see themselves in him
  • If you act without sharing yourself, people judge your actions against perfection.
  • If you share yourself---that's what leaders do, they allow themselves to be vulnerable---then they support you
  • I've refined my technique over hundreds of projects with executives and leaders in business, politics, culture, eduction, military, etc
  • I will describe two parts: the building block, which I describe in more depth in my first TEDx talk, which describes the environmental leadership process with one person.
  • One person won't change a culture, so I'll describe the second part, which uses many building blocks to transform a corporation.

The Building Block

  • The building block is a 4-step process to ask what people care about, have them create a way to act on it, make it manageable, and add accountability, where they report how it went
  • It goes well and they want to share. They know that when they share what they care about people connect with it.
  • If their employees just heard, we're going to use less plastic, well that might mean they're trying to save money
  • If they hear their CEO sharing trying to do his or her best, they see him or her doing what they want to do themselves. By supporting the CEO, they support themselves. So they don't attack, they support.

Building corporate culture with the building block

  • Still the CEO is one person. I do the building block with a team including several executives and a few junior people who will implement the results.
  • We pick an audience to hear the recordings, which could be just the team if they're private, employees if their goal is mainly morale, clients if their goal is sales, the public if PR. The point is someone has to hear for accountability and to motivate depth, but the team chooses for its goals.
  • I do the building block with all ten people (could be half a dozen or a dozen). Most tasks take 2 weeks or a month
  • I meet with them in a month, ask how it went, how it affected them emotionally, their relationships.
  • They always learn. Then I do the building block again, this time restricting the task to in the office.
  • We meet again after they finish their second task. Now they've collectively done 20 tasks, the second usually bigger and more rewarding than first
  • Third meeting we meet as group for a half to full day exercise
  • Based on experience and teamwork, this exercise leads them to create a team exercise based on experience, that the company will implement, usually led by the two junior people who have been part of this engagement from the start
  • I don't know the company. I don't create the project. They do. I'm like a basketball coach. I don't put the ball in the hoop. The experienced people do.
  • I know how to lead individuals and a team to face and overcome the unique challenges of environmental leadership -- feelings of shame, guilt, helplessness, anxiety, futility, and so on.
  • When they bring to company a project, they aren't saying do as I say, not as I do. They're saying: hear my humanity and struggles. I did my best, grew to learn, and am sharing joy and discover with you. Community, connection.

Conclusion

  • I'll leave off here for now, but I wanted to share the professional, executive work I'm doing.
  • If corporations and governments aren't involved, we'll get almost nowhere.
  • I want to engage and activate them so they love acting, get competitive advantages, boost morale, attract talent, etc for acting more sustainably.
  • If they don't their competitors will, so why not enjoy it and act first?


More episodes

View all episodes

  • 790. 790: Talking to a guy injecting on the sidewalk

    47:59||Ep. 790
    On a beautiful sunny Saturday, 9:50am, I was walking to Washington Square Park to charge my battery and talk at 10am to my friend Dan McPherson (he's been on the podcast, where he shared about his heart attack at age 46 the week before we recorded). I saw the guy in the picture injecting. I asked if I could take his picture and a brief conversation ensued.Instead of my planned conversation with Dan, we recorded my experience and thoughts about the conversation with the guy injecting on the sidewalk. I haven't edited anything. I recorded with just my headphone microphone so sorry about the audio quality, but I think you'll be able to understand us fine.I also didn't prepare. I'm not speaking from notes or even more than a few minutes to reflect. You'll get to hear my thoughts raw.As it happens, Dan is about a third of the way through my book, Sustainability Simplified. It came up in conversation, so you'll get to hear the impressions of someone who has read it. Only at the very end of the call did I think to text Dan the pictures, so listen to the end to hear his thoughts on the book.
  • 789. 789: Solomon Schmidt: Author of Legal Gladiator, on Alan Dershowitz

    53:40||Ep. 789
    As a podcast host, I get pitched a lot of authors, books, and more. Most aren't relevant or are counterproductive to sustainability. I received an email promoting the author of Legal Gladiator, a biography of Alan Dershowitz. I knew the name from the news, but didn't know more than the name, maybe a whiff of his being controversial.I looked up the book and author and found both fascinating. I scheduled talking to Solomon unrecorded to meet him and see if the connection would fit. I like bringing leaders from any field to sustainability since the field nearly completely lacks it. Solomon and Alan both seem like leaders, so I invited him.Quoting from the book's page:Praise for Solomon Schmidt:“You are a very talented young man with a bright future ahead of you.”—Pres. Donald Trump “An amazing young author.”—Mike Tyson “[You have] quite a remarkable record. [I’m] really impressed.”—Dr. Noam Chomsky “Solomon, thanks for all you do.”—Gov. Mike Huckabee “Solomon...is perhaps the youngest child historian in America.”—Steve Doocy“Solomon’s doing the hard work and getting after it.—Jocko Willink “[I have] admiration for all [Solomon is] doing to make this a better world—and a more educated world.”—Dame Jane Goodall"A reputable author."—Rep. Jamie RaskinWe talk mostly about Alan, though also about Solomon. We don't talk much about sustainability, though the leadership shines. I am confident you'll find this episode, Solomon, and Alan fascinating. I'd love your thoughts.
  • 788. 788: Susan Liebell: John Locke, Stewardship, and the US Constitution

    01:11:19||Ep. 788
    I quote Susan in my book, Sustainability Simplified. In it you'll see how much John Locke influenced my long-term vision for the US to understand and solve our environmental problems. Learning about the Thirteenth Amendment, which (mostly) banned slavery, and its improbable path to passage and ratification led me to think about solving our environmental problems similarly.I learned that many people working to abolish slavery worked hard when drafting the US Constitution to make it able to support abolitionism and to disallow property in man. Slaveholders opposed them, so they accepted compromises. Still, they put enough into the Constitution to enable weakening the institution enough to eventually end it. I wondered if sustainability might have similar precedent, like some law or phrasing of the Constitution that might have disallowed polluting or depleting.It turns out there was. It was in John Locke's Two Treatises on Government. The more I researched the man, his writings, and our Constitution, the more he seemed to apply to our environmental problems. That research led me to a paper by Susan Liebell, which I link to below.My conversation with Susan explore the application of his work and theories.Her paper that brought me to her: The Text and Context of "Enough and as Good": John Locke as the Foundation of an Environmental Liberalism
  • 787. 787: Travis Fisher, part 1: A nonpartisan, libertarian view on the environment from the Cato Institute

    46:26||Ep. 787
    I've been curious in what ways libertarian views on the environment and sustainability differ from conservative views. Travis worked at the Heritage Foundation, which is more conservative, and now works at the Cato Institute, which is more libertarian. Since I haven't spoken to many libertarians directly, I'm interested in this conversation to learn, so it's a conversation, not a debate.Early in our conversation, he describes some of their differences and similarities, and why he chose Cato. He shares some of his training and background that led him to his views.Then we talked about a few issues: the Inflation Reduction Act, regulation, how government funding of many programs results in industries growing without being profitable from its customers. We look at several moral hazards, including government gaining money and power from permitting polluting behavior and distributing funding evenly so everyone votes for something even if it doesn't help.We recorded just before the election so talked about recording again after the election to talk about how its results affect the political, energy, and pollution landscape.
  • 786. 786: Jan Mulder, part 2: The joy of finding and leading community

    31:32||Ep. 786
    Usually when someone does their commitment with the Spodek Method, they enjoy it. Nearly always they do more than they commit to. Sometimes someone really enjoys it.Jan went to town on his commitment. You might wonder if there's any appeal to picking up litter. Is it worth the effort? Who cares, anyway? After all, more people litter than pick it up, as anyone can tell by how much litter there is and how much it's growing.Yet the pattern I've discovered keeps happening. On the other side of working on sustainability is always community. I can't prove it always happens, but so far it does.In Jan's case, he found community, in particular, people who had long wanted to act. They were just waiting for someone to lead them. When someone did, they embraced acting.How many people around you are waiting for someone to activate them? How much community is waiting to form? How much easier do you think it will be than you probably expect, based on Jan's experience?
  • 785. 785: Josh Bandoch, part 1: Teaching persuasion and leadership

    01:20:20||Ep. 785
    I participated in an online workshop in influence and persuasion that Josh led. We got in touch afterward and found our approaches to the practices and how to learn them overlap. We start this episode talking about his background and what led him to learning and training others in the practices. Then we talk about what we like about learning and practicing them, what works, what doesn't, misconceptions, and other aspects. Some related subjects include authority, extrinsic emotions, management, and such.We practiced the Spodek Method, him experiencing it for the first time. In this first conversation, he only experienced being led to share what the environment means to him and coming up with a commitment to help evoke that meaning. You can hear that beyond just participating in the exercise, he's also analyzing it as a professional. We'll have to wait for his second exercise to hear his experience and analysis of the whole exercise.
  • 784. 784: Serving in Uniform on September 11, 2024

    14:42||Ep. 784
    If you haven't listened to episode 781: My New Major Life Volunteering Community Project, four years in the making, listen to it first for context.That episode describes my journey to start volunteering as an auxiliary police officer and the background to it. Depending on how well you know me or not, you may find the activity as surprising as I do, though I seem to be a minority in that regard. Everyone else congratulates me. I remark on how different this part of my identity seems compared to the younger me who protested America's involvement in Central America, disrupted graduation to protest Apartheid, and knew friends who chose to be arrested at such protests.This episode recounts one of my first activities as an auxiliary. One month ago today I participated in uniform in the Sixth Precinct's September 11 memorial service. I didn't expect the experience to affect me as much as it did. It did, so I'm sharing it, along with how the activity emerged from living more sustainably, related to how living in unsustainable modernity inhibits introspection and reflection with constant distraction.
  • 783. 783: Jan Mulder, part 1: Listening to every episode of this podcast, starting from episode 000

    01:11:03||Ep. 783
    Jan is a listener of this podcast who contacted me about how it changed his life. He is listening to each episode, starting from the beginning. I invited him to be a guest and he accepted. We've also crossed paths through working with podcast guest Dave Gardner, and his work in Growthbusters and running for President of the United States.Jan is Dutch, living in Germany, so can't vote in the US, but acts on sustainability locally. He told me he found my podcast made him feel empowered to act in a world where most people seem resigned not to act.I invited him to share more and to experience the Spodek Method. Beyond recording this episode, he joined the sustainability leadership workshop.To other listeners: if you're interested in sharing, others can learn from you. I invite you to contact me. You don't have to be a guest, but you may like it. You can also connect with the rest of this growing community.
  • 782. 782: Jane Muncke PhD MSc: Toxins in your food from plastic packaging. You'd rather know.

    43:39||Ep. 782
    Toxic chemicals leach from food packaging into your food. Some of these chemicals disrupt your hormones. Some cause cancer. Some affect your children more. Some disperse into the environment and harm wildlife.For 300,000 years, humans lived without plastic. We created this system, maybe thinking only of the effects we wanted, imagining these toxic effects wouldn't happen. Maybe we didn't imagine they could happen. We don't have to create these materials or use them. We are creating more all the time. There's just so much oil, it's so cheap, and there's nothing stopping producers from creating and selling them. Nearly everyone agrees a role of government is to protect you from my taking or destroying your life, liberty, and property, yet businesses and government gain money and power from creating them.Jane's research and courses inform us of the dangers the producers don't want us to know about. In this episode, she shares how she discovered this problem, what she's doing about it, and details about the problems. She didn't originally intend to go in this direction, but chemicals from plastic were leaching into other experiments she was doing. The producer of the leaching materials didn't tell her. She had to do new research to find out, saw its seriousness, and kept going.It's scary to learn. Still, while I'd rather live in a world where we don't permit people to poison us and profit from it, as long as we do, I'd rather know than not know.The Food Packaging ForumTheir Crash Course in Food Contact Materials and HealthThe article she co-wrote published in the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology the day of this episode: Evidence for widespread human exposure to food contact chemicalsA CNN article on Jane's research that happened to come out the day before this episode: Toxic chemicals used in food preparation leach into human bodies, study finds