Share

Ipse Dixit
From the Archives 71: Ad Council, How High is your E.Q.? (1977)
Season 1, Ep. 184
•
In 1977, the Department of Commerce and the Advertising Council published a booklet titled "The American Economic System...and Your Part In It," which was distributed for free to anyone who wanted a copy. The booklet is available here. Naturally, the Ad Council also prepared a massive advertising campaign for the economics education program, which the New York Times described here. I found this quotation from the launch party quite amusing:
Another supporter of the free enterprise system, Mayo J. Thompson, a former commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission, was on the program this morning. And he quickly won the hearts of his listeners by attacking in a fine Texas drawl the Eastern lawyers who were on the F.T.C. staff. Speaking of that staff he said, “I think that the dominant attitude is that capitalism is not quite as respectable as it ought to be . . . the suspicion lingers that the whole business of making profits is morally tainted.”Mr. Thompson, now a partner in the law firm of Akin, Gump, Stauss, Hauer & Feld, portrayed the staff as being made up of people overwhelmed by the belief of truth in advertising. The former commissioner, however, believes in the “harmless untruth.”“Common sense tells nonlawyers that, unless a false and deceptive advertisement results in a dollar loss to the consumers, no harm has been done and the whole matter should be dumped in the nearest round file,” he said.Maintaining also that advertising within certain bounds should also be given freedom of speech protection of the First Amendment he said: “if politicians and journalists were held to the F.T.C.'s absolute truth standards, for example, the presses would grind to a halt in a matter of hours and the airways would fall silent in a flash of blue smoke.”For that he received his loudest round of applause.In any case, the Ad Council also published this 7" record titled "How High is Your E.Q.?," with an assortment of PSAs for the booklet. I especially like the "attorney" and "professor" ones.
More episodes
View all episodes

827. Sam Williams on the Jokerfication of Law
58:56||Season 1, Ep. 827In this episode, Sam Williams, Associate Professor of Law and Reference and Instruction Librarian at the University of Idaho College of Law discusses several of his articles, including “The Law is Weirder than AI,” which was published in 2024 with the Hofstra Law Review, and “The Jokerfication of Law,” which was published with Hedgehogs and Foxes. Williams discusses how these pieces shed light on the nature of the weird and the eerie in law and legal scholarship, and how professors should think of their roles in an increasingly chaotic world. He also shares his thoughts on weird and silly legal scholarship, the place for such scholarship in the broader legal academic literature, and inspirations for his work—including Ipse Dixit’s very own Brian Frye. Williams is on Bluesky at @sawilliams.bsky.social. This episode was guest hosted by Michael Smith, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law. Michael Smith is on Bluesky at @msmith750.bsky.social
826. Christopher Brooks on Appellate Judicial Section
26:28||Season 1, Ep. 826In this episode, Christopher T. Brooks, Professor of History at East Stroudsburg University, discusses his work on appellate judicial selection. He explains that state appellate judges are usually either elected or appointed with the advice of nominating committees. He argues that both methods are flawed, and that it would be better for judges to be appointed by elected nominating committees. Brooks is on LinkedIn.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
825. Valentin Jeutner on Conceptual Legal Writing
43:34||Season 1, Ep. 825In this episode, Valentin Jeutner, Associate Professor of Law at Lund University and Retained Lecturer in Law at Pembroke College, Oxford University, discusses his book "[l]ex machina: unlikely encounters of international law and technology," which is published by Lund University. Jeutner begins by introducing listeners to conceptual legal writing, describing its relationship to conceptual art and conceptual writing. He provides a preliminary taxonomy of conceptual legal writing and explains his own practice of conceptual legal writing. In particular, he reflects on how conceptual legal writing can help readers see legal texts in a new and different light. He also reads a short text composed using a conceptual legal writing method. You can read Jeutner's "Fragmentary Catalogue of Conceptual Legal Writing" here, and his book "The Aesthetic Authority of Law: Experiments with Legal Form" here. Jeutner is on Bluesky.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
824. Sharon Yadin on the Nature of Regulation
42:10||Season 1, Ep. 824In this episode, Sharon Yadin, Senior Lecturer of Law and Regulation at the Yezreel Valley College School of Public Administration and Public Policy, discusses her draft article "The Hidden Nature of Regulation," which will be published in the Harvard Negotiation Law Review. Yadin begins by describing the conventional bifurcation of regulation into "hard" and "soft" approaches. She observes that in practice, regulation is always negotiated between regulators and regulated parties. And she explains how this alternative perspective on the nature of regulation should inflect our approach to it. Yadin is on Twitter and Bluesky.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
823. Jorge Contreras on Silly Patents
42:43||Ep. 823In this episode, Jorge L. Contreras, Distinguished University Professor, James T. Jensen Endowed Professor for Transactional Law, and Director of the Program on Intellectual Property and Technology Law at the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law, discusses his draft article "Silly Patents." Contreras begins by describing why patents exist and how the patent system works. He observes that some patents are unusually "silly," because it doesn't seem like they should exist. He explains why the Patent Office issues silly patents and reflects on what they can tell us about the patent system. Contreras is on Twitter and Bluesky.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
822. Nikola Datzov on AI Judges
46:03||Season 1, Ep. 822In this episode, Nikola Datzov, Associate Professor of Law at the University of North Dakota School of Law, discusses his article "AI Jurisprudence: Toward Automated Justice," which will be published in the Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. Datzov begins by briefly explaining how AI models works and why judicial systems are primed to use them in certain ways. He provides a taxonomy of how judges could use AI models. And he reflects on benefits and risks associated with the judiciary's use of AI.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
821. Mark Blankenship on the "Aesthetic Nondiscrimination" Doctrine
41:41||Season 1, Ep. 821In this episode, Mark Edward Blankenship, Jr., Assistant Professor of Law at St. Thomas University College of Law, discusses his article "Reconsidering the 'Aesthetic Nondiscrimination' Doctrine in American Copyright Law," which is published in the Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law. Blankenship begins by describing the origin of copyright's so-called "aesthetic nondiscrimination" doctrine. He explains how scholars have characterized its purpose of problems. And he analyzes the doctrine in light of discrimination law.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
830. John Tehranian on Copyright & Inequality
43:42||Season 1, Ep. 830In this episode, John Tehranian, Paul W. Wildman Chair and Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School and a founding partner of One LLP, discusses his new book, "The Secret Life of Copyright: Intellectual Property and Inequality in the Age of AI," which is published by Cambridge University Press. Tehranian begins by describing the critical IP theory movement and how his work fits into that movement. Then he explains how copyright doctrine creates systemic inequality in the allocation and use of copyright, through its definition of ownership, joint authorship, and derivative works, as well as the relationship between copyright and the First Amendment. Tehranian is on Twitter. This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
829. Stephen Cicirelli on Philosophy, Literature, and Plagiarism
30:31||Season 1, Ep. 829In this episode, Stephen Cicirelli, a Lecturer of English at Saint Peter’s University, discusses philosophy, literature, and plagiarism. He begins by reflecting on his studies of Kierkegaard, and how it influenced his later work as an author. He describes some of his recent fiction and how it incorporates elements from his study of philosophy. And he explains how he addresses plagiarism and AI as a creative writing instructor. Cicirelli is on Twitter.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.