Share

cover art for From the Archives 68: Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean (1973)

Ipse Dixit

From the Archives 68: Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean (1973)

Season 1, Ep. 181

In 1973, at the height of the Watergate scandal, a record label called "Mr. G Records" released the song "Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean," written by Bob Warren and supposedly performed by "The Creep," as a 45 single. The same track is on both sides, a typical comic song featuring barroom piano. Apparently, the song initially got some airplay, until listeners started complaining. Here are the lyrics:

We're Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean

The way we've been treated is really obscene

To think that a bug worth hardly a shrug

Could end up by getting us tossed in the jug


We all got the gate for no reason or rhyme

You'd think we'd committed some horrible crime

Our minds may be dirty, but our hands are clean

We're Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean


We're Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean

Our job was to see that the White House stayed green

We might have had flaws, like bending the laws

But God only knows it was for a good cause


There's no power shortage where we were concerned

And what little profit resulted, we earned

For lovelier fellows you never have seen

Than Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean


We're Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean

Our past has been fat, but the future looks lean

With backs to the wall, we're taking the fall

But dammit, we only robbed Pete to pay Paul


Just when we getting to be well-to-do

The Watergate turned into our Waterloo

And now everybody is out to demean

Poor Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean


Yes, we're Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean

We're perfectly willing to spill every bean

We've nothing to hide, with God on our side

He knows we were only along for the ride


But so it won't come as terrible blow

There's one little thing that we think you should know

Whatever we say isn't quite what we mean

We're Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean


Oh yes, we're Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean

Things won't be the same when we're gone from the scene

But people will still recall with a thrill

Our sell-out performance on Capitol Hill


It just isn't fair to take all of the blame

When all we were doing was playing the game

Now all of Washington's caught in between

Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell and Dean

More episodes

View all episodes

  • 825. Valentin Jeutner on Conceptual Legal Writing

    43:34||Season 1, Ep. 825
    In this episode, Valentin Jeutner, Associate Professor of Law at Lund University and Retained Lecturer in Law at Pembroke College, Oxford University, discusses his book "[l]ex machina: unlikely encounters of international law and technology," which is published by Lund University. Jeutner begins by introducing listeners to conceptual legal writing, describing its relationship to conceptual art and conceptual writing. He provides a preliminary taxonomy of conceptual legal writing and explains his own practice of conceptual legal writing. In particular, he reflects on how conceptual legal writing can help readers see legal texts in a new and different light. He also reads a short text composed using a conceptual legal writing method. You can read Jeutner's "Fragmentary Catalogue of Conceptual Legal Writing" here, and his book "The Aesthetic Authority of Law: Experiments with Legal Form" here. Jeutner is on Bluesky.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
  • 824. Sharon Yadin on the Nature of Regulation

    42:10||Season 1, Ep. 824
    In this episode, Sharon Yadin, Senior Lecturer of Law and Regulation at the Yezreel Valley College School of Public Administration and Public Policy, discusses her draft article "The Hidden Nature of Regulation," which will be published in the Harvard Negotiation Law Review. Yadin begins by describing the conventional bifurcation of regulation into "hard" and "soft" approaches. She observes that in practice, regulation is always negotiated between regulators and regulated parties. And she explains how this alternative perspective on the nature of regulation should inflect our approach to it. Yadin is on Twitter and Bluesky.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
  • 823. Jorge Contreras on Silly Patents

    42:43||Ep. 823
    In this episode, Jorge L. Contreras, Distinguished University Professor, James T. Jensen Endowed Professor for Transactional Law, and Director of the Program on Intellectual Property and Technology Law at the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law, discusses his draft article "Silly Patents." Contreras begins by describing why patents exist and how the patent system works. He observes that some patents are unusually "silly," because it doesn't seem like they should exist. He explains why the Patent Office issues silly patents and reflects on what they can tell us about the patent system. Contreras is on Twitter and Bluesky.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
  • 822. Nikola Datzov on AI Judges

    46:03||Season 1, Ep. 822
    In this episode, Nikola Datzov, Associate Professor of Law at the University of North Dakota School of Law, discusses his article "AI Jurisprudence: Toward Automated Justice," which will be published in the Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. Datzov begins by briefly explaining how AI models works and why judicial systems are primed to use them in certain ways. He provides a taxonomy of how judges could use AI models. And he reflects on benefits and risks associated with the judiciary's use of AI.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
  • 821. Mark Blankenship on the "Aesthetic Nondiscrimination" Doctrine

    41:41||Season 1, Ep. 821
    In this episode, Mark Edward Blankenship, Jr., Assistant Professor of Law at St. Thomas University College of Law, discusses his article "Reconsidering the 'Aesthetic Nondiscrimination' Doctrine in American Copyright Law," which is published in the Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law. Blankenship begins by describing the origin of copyright's so-called "aesthetic nondiscrimination" doctrine. He explains how scholars have characterized its purpose of problems. And he analyzes the doctrine in light of discrimination law.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
  • 830. John Tehranian on Copyright & Inequality

    43:42||Season 1, Ep. 830
    In this episode, John Tehranian, Paul W. Wildman Chair and Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School and a founding partner of One LLP, discusses his new book, "The Secret Life of Copyright: Intellectual Property and Inequality in the Age of AI," which is published by Cambridge University Press. Tehranian begins by describing the critical IP theory movement and how his work fits into that movement. Then he explains how copyright doctrine creates systemic inequality in the allocation and use of copyright, through its definition of ownership, joint authorship, and derivative works, as well as the relationship between copyright and the First Amendment. Tehranian is on Twitter. This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
  • 829. Stephen Cicirelli on Philosophy, Literature, and Plagiarism

    30:31||Season 1, Ep. 829
    In this episode, Stephen Cicirelli, a Lecturer of English at Saint Peter’s University, discusses philosophy, literature, and plagiarism. He begins by reflecting on his studies of Kierkegaard, and how it influenced his later work as an author. He describes some of his recent fiction and how it incorporates elements from his study of philosophy. And he explains how he addresses plagiarism and AI as a creative writing instructor. Cicirelli is on Twitter.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
  • 828. Thomas Basboll on Plagiarism

    53:16||Season 1, Ep. 828
    In this episode, Thomas Basboll, a resident writing consultant at the Copenhagen Business School and the author of the Inframethodology blog, discusses his work on plagiarism, among other things. Basboll begins by introducing himself. He then discusses a series of articles he wrote on a plagiarism incident in the discipline of critical management studies. He reflects on the reaction to his articles - or the lack thereof - and what it can tell us about the institutional role of academic plagiarism norms. He also discusses alternative approaches to pedagogy and plagiarism that could be more effective. Basboll is on Twitter.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
  • 827. Bill Childs on Amusement Park Law

    33:39||Season 1, Ep. 827
    In this episode, Bill Childs, a partner at Bowman and Brooke LLP and an adjunct professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, discusses his new casebook "Recreation and Risk," which is published by Carolina Academic Press. The book provides all the material for a law school class on the law of amusement parks, which covers torts, contracts, insurance, criminal law, and more. Childs begins by explaining how he became interested in amusement parks and the legal issues surrounding them. Then he explains why the subject matter makes for such an effective law school class, with a significant practical and experiential element. Childs is on Bluesky.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.