Share
Global Pause - Rethink the Future
#81: To economise time independant
Ep. 83
•
We can only economise time if it is derivative, but how can we achieve the impossible unless our way of life disinhibits an aspiration that allows for this imposture to be the given of our relationality. We explore.
More episodes
View all episodes
88. #86: Rethinking virtue signalling
20:20||Ep. 88What do we presuppose when a signal is given without substance? What is the mechanism never thought through that allows this. We discuss87. #85: Rethinking the business of "life"
29:27||Ep. 87Is human action ever not business activity when we practise economising actions? We discuss86. #84: Rethinking time in light of sustainability
18:07||Ep. 86If we do not address the existential claim of the way our time is given we cannot create a sustainable way of life. We discuss85. #83: The diminishing return of the consumer
26:16||Ep. 85The form of life that of the consumer, can no longer serve, if it ever has "life" We discuss why "values" or intangible highlight its impasse and the diminishing return of this form of life.84. #82: Is change possible when the world view is never questioned?
13:12||Ep. 84What possibility is there for change when unquestioned givens are never challenged. We discuss this in light sustainable development and the imperialism of a form of life.82. #80: Rethinking the "circular" economy
16:34||Ep. 82Circular economy over linear lives, how can this possibly work for sustainability? We explore the resource never raised when the question of a sustainable future is touted.81. #79:Rethinking economic activity in reference to what underwrites it
22:19||Ep. 81If what underwrites exchanges is the preeminent good of our time, then if the future is to be given differently the potential for it exists there. We explore80. #78: Rethinking activism in light of what we don't question
29:41||Ep. 80We rethink activism in light of our way of life that is never questioned when this form of action is championed. What is it beholden to that compromises the change it ultimately is oriented towards? We discuss