Dis Or That: A Disney Debate Podcast

SummaryIn this episode, Justin and Chris discuss two iconic Disney hotels: the Grand Floridian and the Polynesian. While they haven't stayed at either hotel, they have spent time in the lobbies and surrounding areas. They talk about the unique experiences each hotel offers, the cost of staying there, and the special events and decorations, such as the Grand Floridian's Christmas tree and the Polynesian's Easter eggs. They also mention the distinct scents of each hotel, with the Grand Floridian having a clean and proper scent and the Polynesian having a tropical and sweet scent. In this part of the conversation, Chris and Justin discuss the Contemporary Resort and the Polynesian Resort at Disney World. They express their preference for the Polynesian over the Contemporary, citing the unique theming and atmosphere of the Polynesian. They also compare the pools at both resorts, with the Polynesian pool being described as world-class. The conversation then shifts to the dining options, with Victoria and Albert's at the Grand Floridian being mentioned as the most expensive restaurant in Disney World. They also discuss the family-style restaurant Ohana at the Polynesian. The conversation concludes with a discussion of the bars at the resorts, with Trader Sam's at the Polynesian being praised for its theming and interactive experience. The conversation compares the Grand Floridian and Polynesian hotels at Disney World. They discuss the history, theming, amenities, dining options, and overall experience of each hotel. They highlight the unique features of the Grand Floridian, such as its Victorian elegance, proximity to Magic Kingdom, and the wedding chapel. They also discuss the Polynesian's tropical theme, the popular 'Ohana restaurant, and the bungalows. The conversation concludes by emphasizing the importance of spending time at the resorts and the overall appeal of both hotels.TakeawaysThe Grand Floridian and the Polynesian are two iconic Disney hotels with unique experiences and atmospheres.Staying at these hotels can be expensive, but it's a bucket list item for many Disney fans.The Grand Floridian is known for its grandiose architecture and elegant atmosphere, while the Polynesian offers a tropical and relaxed vibe.Both hotels have special events and decorations, such as the Grand Floridian's Christmas tree and the Polynesian's Easter eggs.The scents of the hotels are distinct, with the Grand Floridian having a clean and proper scent and the Polynesian having a tropical and sweet scent. The Polynesian Resort is preferred over the Contemporary Resort due to its unique theming and atmosphere.The Polynesian pool is considered world-class, with its grotto and slide.Victoria and Albert's at the Grand Floridian is the most expensive restaurant in Disney World.Ohana at the Polynesian is a popular family-style restaurant.Trader Sam's at the Polynesian is highly recommended for its theming and interactive experience. The Grand Floridian is considered the flagship hotel of Disney World and offers a Victorian elegance and proximity to Magic Kingdom.The Polynesian has a tropical theme, popular dining options like 'Ohana, and unique accommodations like the bungalows.Both hotels provide a unique and immersive experience, and spending time at the resorts is highly recommended.The choice between the Grand Floridian and Polynesian depends on personal preferences and the desired theming and amenities.

SummaryIn this conversation, the hosts discuss the movies 'Inside Out' and 'Zootopia,' comparing their cast, humor, and impact. They delve into the voice actors, adult humor, and the significance of the films in the context of Disney animation. The conversation also touches on the challenges of voice casting and the impact of well-known actors in animated films. The conversation covers the comparison between the movies 'Inside Out' and 'Zootopia', discussing memorable scenes, humor, adult jokes, emotional impact, world-building, pacing, and themes. It also delves into the potential for sequels and the challenges of maintaining quality in follow-up films. A discussion comparing the animation styles, music, and emotional impact of the movies 'Inside Out' and 'Zootopia'. The conversation delves into the unique animation style of 'Inside Out', the emotional depth of 'Zootopia', and the impact of the music in both films. The hosts express their anticipation for 'Inside Out 2' and the potential impact it may have on the original film. They also discuss the complexity of the characters and the skill required in creating animated movies.TakeawaysComparison of 'Inside Out' and 'Zootopia'Impact of voice actors in animated filmsAdult-Friendly humor in animated moviesChallenges of voice casting in animationSignificance of 'Inside Out' and 'Zootopia' in Disney animation The impact of humor and memorable scenes in 'Zootopia' and 'Inside Out'The emotional impact and world-building in 'Inside Out'The challenges of maintaining quality in sequels and the importance of pacing and themes The unique animation style of 'Inside Out' and the emotional depth of 'Zootopia' contribute to the distinct appeal of each film.The impact of the music in both movies, as well as the anticipation for 'Inside Out 2', are key points of interest for the hosts.The complexity of the characters and the skill required in creating animated movies are highlighted as important aspects of the discussion.

In this episode of the Disney Debate Podcast, the hosts discuss the rides Soarin' and Living with the Land in Epcot's Land Pavilion. They debate the merits of each ride, including the immersive experience of Soarin' and the educational aspect of Living with the Land. They also touch on topics such as the narration in the rides, the variation in experiences, and the rise of Disney fandom among millennials. In this conversation, the hosts discuss the cult-like following of both Soren and Living with the Land at Epcot. They highlight the unique experiences and features of each ride, including the immersive environments, scent technology, and the impressive dome in Soren. They also mention the potential for upgrades and changes to both rides in the future. The hosts express their love for both attractions and acknowledge the passionate fan bases of each. They encourage listeners to participate in a poll to determine which ride is the favorite.TakeawaysSoarin' offers an immersive experience and showcases revolutionary ride technologyLiving with the Land provides an educational experience and highlights sustainability and farmingThe narration in Soarin' by Patrick Warburton is highly regardedLiving with the Land has a cult following and offers variation in experiencesThe rise of Disney fandom among millennials has led to a cult of Epcot and Disney adults Soren and Living with the Land have passionate fan bases and are both beloved attractions at Epcot.Soren offers an immersive experience with its impressive dome, scent technology, and variety of scenery.Living with the Land provides a unique ride through different biomes and offers a mix of dark ride, boat ride, and immersive garden show experiences.Both rides have room for upgrades and changes, with potential for new videos and technologies.The hosts encourage listeners to participate in a poll to determine the favorite ride.

In this episode, Justin and Chris discuss two unique show experiences at Disney theme parks: Turtle Talk with Crush and Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor. They highlight the use of advanced technology to bring animated characters to life and express surprise that this technology hasn't been implemented more widely. They discuss the comedic elements of both shows and the impressive acting required to interact with the audience in real-time. They also mention the intimate and interactive nature of Turtle Talk and the larger scale of Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor. Overall, they appreciate the humor and entertainment value of both experiences. In this part of the conversation, Chris and Justin discuss the Delta Dream Flight ride and its replacement by Buzz Lightyear. They also talk about the placement of Monster's Inc. Laugh Floor in Tomorrowland and its lack of a space theme. The conversation then shifts to the massive aquarium at The Seas with Nemo & Friends and the underwhelming gift shop. They briefly discuss the AirPods and the desire for a sweat-resistant version. The conversation ends with a mention of the Vision Pro virtual reality app. In this conversation, Justin and Chris discuss the differences between Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor and Turtle Talk with Crush, two interactive shows at Disney World. They compare the experiences, humor, audience participation, and overall enjoyment of each attraction. They also touch on the unique aspects of Turtle Talk, such as the improvisation and interaction with kids, and the secret adult humor incorporated into the show. The hosts express their love for both attractions and discuss the potential future of Tomorrowland. They conclude by encouraging listeners to engage with them on social media and thank their sponsor, the Magic Candle Company.TakeawaysTurtle Talk with Crush and Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor are two unique show experiences at Disney theme parks.The use of advanced technology to bring animated characters to life is impressive.The shows require talented actors who can interact with the audience in real-time.Turtle Talk with Crush offers an intimate and interactive experience, while Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor has a larger scale.Both shows provide humor and entertainment for guests. The Delta Dream Flight ride was replaced by Buzz Lightyear in Tomorrowland.Monster's Inc. Laugh Floor doesn't fit the space theme of Tomorrowland.The aquarium at The Seas with Nemo & Friends is one of the largest indoor aquariums in the world.The gift shop at The Seas with Nemo & Friends is underwhelming.There is a desire for sweat-resistant AirPods.The Vision Pro virtual reality app is mentioned. Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor and Turtle Talk with Crush are both interactive shows at Disney World, but they offer different experiences and humor.Turtle Talk with Crush focuses on improvisation and interaction with kids, while Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor has more structured jokes and audience participation.Both attractions incorporate secret adult humor, but Turtle Talk with Crush allows for more playful and off-the-cuff interactions.The hosts express their love for both attractions and discuss the potential future of Tomorrowland.Listeners are encouraged to engage with the hosts on social media and check out their sponsor, the Magic Candle Company.

Chris and Justin discuss their preferences for the dark side of Star Wars, including the cool factor of the villains and the appeal of the stormtroopers. They also touch on the influence of the Phantom Menace and the rise of Darth Maul. They debate the merits of the clone troopers versus the stormtroopers and discuss the design of the First Order stormtrooper helmet. They explore the concept of good guys versus bad guys in Star Wars and the gray areas in between. They also mention various force powers associated with the dark side, such as force lightning and force choke. The conversation explores the different factions and aesthetics of the light side and dark side in Star Wars. They discuss the Nightsisters and Dathomir Witch Magic as examples of dark side users, and the Guardians of the Wills and the Church of the Force as examples of light side users. They also compare the aesthetics of the dark side, such as the clean and menacing designs of the Empire, to the more varied and unique designs of the light side. The conversation touches on the different starships and their designs, with a debate between the TIE fighter and the X-Wing. They also discuss the power and design of the Death Star and Star Destroyers. The conversation concludes with a discussion on the different fighting styles of the light side and dark side, including the use of double-bladed sabers and the unique styles of Darth Vader and Ahsoka Tano. In this conversation, Justin and Chris debate the cool factor of the light side and dark side in Star Wars. They discuss the aesthetics, characters, powers, and overall appeal of each side. They also touch on the themes of good vs. evil, the allure of the dark side, and the potential for redemption. The conversation highlights the complexity and depth of the Star Wars universe and the different perspectives fans have on the light and dark sides.TakeawaysThe dark side of Star Wars has a strong cool factor, with villains like Darth Maul and stormtroopers being particularly appealing.The design of the First Order stormtrooper helmet is sleek and modern, making it a favorite among fans.The line between good guys and bad guys in Star Wars is often blurred, with characters like Anakin Skywalker and Cal Kestis showing the potential for both light and dark sides.Force powers associated with the dark side, such as force lightning and force choke, are powerful and intimidating.The rebellion and the Jedi Order provide a contrast to the dark side, with their individualism and unique outfits. The light side and dark side in Star Wars are represented by different factions and aesthetics.The Nightsisters and Dathomir Witch Magic are examples of dark side users, while the Guardians of the Wills and the Church of the Force represent the light side.The Empire has a clean and menacing design, while the rebels have more varied and unique designs.The TIE fighter and X-Wing are debated as the cooler starships.The Death Star and Star Destroyers are iconic symbols of the dark side's power.Different fighting styles are seen between the light side and dark side, including the use of double-bladed sabers and the unique styles of Darth Vader and Ahsoka Tano. The dark side has a cool and menacing aesthetic, with characters like Darth Vader and Darth Maul standing out.The light side offers a sense of hope and heroism, with characters like Luke Skywalker and Obi-Wan Kenobi embodying these qualities.The dark side has powerful and destructive abilities, while the light side focuses on selflessness and compassion.The allure of the dark side lies in its freedom to embrace emotions and desires, but it often leads to corruption and destruction.The light side represents redemption and the potential for change, as seen in characters like Anakin Skywalker and Kylo Ren.

SummaryIn this episode of Dis or That, Justin and Chris debate which is the better ride: Space Mountain or Big Thunder Mountain. They discuss the number of theme parks each ride is in, the theming and scenery, the thrill factor, and the re-rideability. Justin argues that Space Mountain is the better mountain due to its indoor coaster experience and unique theming, while Chris argues that Big Thunder Mountain is more exciting and has better scenery. They also discuss the different overlays and re-theming options for Space Mountain. The conversation primarily focuses on comparing two roller coasters: Big Thunder Mountain and Space Mountain. The hosts discuss the ride experience, theming, popularity, and overall enjoyment of each attraction. They also touch on the myth of Big Thunder Mountain dislodging kidney stones and the potential for refurbishments or updates to the rides. The conversation segues into a discussion about other Disney polls they have conducted and the results they have received. They briefly mention the Sorcerer Mickey hat at Hollywood Studios and the overall state of the park. In this conversation, Justin and Chris discuss their thoughts on the theming and placement of attractions in Disney parks, specifically focusing on Mickey and Minnie's Runaway Railway and Space Mountain. They explore the lack of cohesiveness in the theming of Mickey and Minnie's Runaway Railway and suggest alternative theming options. They also discuss the placement of Star Wars attractions in Hollywood Studios and the need for more Muppets-themed attractions. The conversation concludes with a debate on whether Space Mountain or Big Thunder Mountain is the superior mountain attraction.TakeawaysSpace Mountain is an indoor coaster that offers a unique space-themed experienceBig Thunder Mountain is more exciting and has better scenerySpace Mountain has the option for different overlays and re-themingBoth rides have their own charm and appeal to different preferences Big Thunder Mountain and Space Mountain are compared in terms of ride experience, theming, and popularity.The myth of Big Thunder Mountain dislodging kidney stones is discussed.The hosts mention the potential for refurbishments or updates to the rides.The results of previous Disney polls are briefly mentioned.The conversation touches on the Sorcerer Mickey hat at Hollywood Studios and the overall state of the park. The theming of attractions in Disney parks should be cohesive and well-plannedAlternative theming options can be explored to enhance the overall experience of an attractionThe placement of attractions in a park should be strategic and consider the overall themeThere is a need for more Muppets-themed attractions in Disney parksThe debate between Space Mountain and Big Thunder Mountain as the superior mountain attraction is subjective

In this episode, Justin and Chris engage in a friendly debate between the Mexico Pavilion and the France Pavilion at Epcot's World Showcase. They discuss the food and drink options, as well as the overall experience of each pavilion. While Justin argues for the delicious and familiar Mexican cuisine, Chris highlights the refined and diverse offerings of French cuisine. The debate explores the preferences of different types of eaters and the role of roleplay in the Epcot experience. The conversation compares the quick service options, Mexican fare, and French cuisine in the Mexico and France pavilions at Epcot. It also discusses the dessert options and drinks available in each pavilion. The atmosphere and indoor experience of the pavilions are compared, along with the rides Three Caballeros and Ratatouille. In this episode, Chris and Justin debate the merits of the France and Mexico pavilions in Epcot's World Showcase. They compare the Ratatouille and Three Caballeros rides, discuss the use of glasses in screen-based rides, and evaluate the queue experiences. They also explore the entertainment options in both pavilions, including music performances. Ultimately, Chris argues for the charm and cuisine of France, while Justin champions the lively atmosphere and music of Mexico.TakeawaysThe Mexico Pavilion offers a variety of quick service options, including Mexican fare like tacos and burritos.The France Pavilion offers a range of French cuisine, including baguettes, crepes, and pastries.Both pavilions have unique dessert options, such as beignets in the France Pavilion and ice cream sandwiches in the Mexico Pavilion.The Mexico Pavilion is known for its margaritas, while the France Pavilion offers Grand Marnier slushies and a variety of wines and champagnes.The Mexico Pavilion has a fun and lively atmosphere, while the France Pavilion has a more elegant and sophisticated ambiance.Both pavilions provide indoor experiences, with the Mexico Pavilion offering air conditioning and the France Pavilion featuring a nighttime-themed setting.The Three Caballeros ride in the Mexico Pavilion is a classic attraction, while the Ratatouille ride in the France Pavilion offers a unique trackless ride experience. The Ratatouille and Three Caballeros rides offer different experiences, with Ratatouille featuring screens and glasses and Three Caballeros providing a more classic dark ride experience.The queue experience in Ratatouille is immersive and features practical sets, while the Mexico pavilion offers a more basic switchback queue.Both pavilions offer unique entertainment options, with France showcasing the France movie and Beauty and the Beast sing-along, and Mexico featuring the Mariachi Cobre band and the Coco-themed Miguel character.The Mexico pavilion offers a lively atmosphere with mariachi music, delicious food options, and a vibrant shopping experience, while the France pavilion offers a more refined and elegant ambiance with gourmet cuisine and high-end shopping.Ultimately, the choice between the two pavilions depends on personal preferences for cuisine, music, and overall atmosphere.

SummaryIn this episode, Justin and Chris compare the movies Moana and Frozen. They discuss the themes of love, sisterhood, and identity in Frozen, as well as the themes of finding identity and forgiveness in Moana. They also highlight the complexity of the characters and the strong sister relationship in Frozen. The cast of both movies is praised for their excellent performances. Overall, both movies are considered top-notch Disney films with powerful themes that resonate with audiences of all ages. In this part of the conversation, the hosts discuss the impact of voice actors in animated films, focusing on the performances of Alan Tudyk and Josh Gad. They also explore the role of sidekick characters and the underutilization of Pua in Moana. The success of Olaf as a sidekick and the genuine nature of Josh Gad's performance are highlighted. The versatility of Alan Tudyk as a voice actor is praised, and the surprise casting of Nicole Scherzinger as Moana's mother is discussed. The singing abilities of the Moana cast and the introduction of Lin-Manuel Miranda to the Disney family are also examined. The hosts debate the impact of Lin-Manuel Miranda's music in Moana and the existence of Lin-Manuel Miranda fatigue. In this episode, Chris and Justin discuss the impact of popular songs, the fatigue of overplayed songs, and the success of Christmas songs in Frozen and Moana. They also explore the underrated songs in Frozen and the role of sidekick songs in Disney movies. The influence of Lin-Manuel Miranda and the perfect mix of music in Moana are highlighted. The visual complexity of Moana and the success of Frozen at the box office are discussed. The cultural impact and franchise potential of Frozen are examined, along with the lasting impact of both movies. The complexity and death in Disney movies and the subtle Star Wars nod in Frozen are also touched upon.TakeawaysVoice actors can greatly enhance the impact of animated characters, as seen in the performances of Alan Tudyk and Josh Gad.The role of sidekick characters can vary in terms of personality and contribution to the story.The underutilization of certain characters, such as Pua in Moana, can be a missed opportunity.The success of Olaf as a sidekick character is attributed to the combination of physical comedy and strong punchlines delivered by Josh Gad.Alan Tudyk and Josh Gad are praised for their versatile voice acting abilities.The surprise casting of Nicole Scherzinger as Moana's mother showcases the importance of vocal talent in animated films.The singing abilities of the Moana cast, including Lin-Manuel Miranda, contribute to the film's musical success.Lin-Manuel Miranda's music in Moana is praised for its catchy and unique style.The debate on Lin-Manuel Miranda fatigue highlights differing opinions on the impact of his music in various projects. Popular songs can become overplayed and lead to listener fatigue.Christmas songs can achieve great success and become holiday classics.Underrated songs in Disney movies can still have a significant impact.The collaboration of story, visuals, and music is crucial in creating a successful movie.The success of a movie at the box office does not necessarily determine its quality or impact.Disney movies often contain complex themes and references that appeal to a wide range of audiences.