Share

cover art for Richard Wolff & Michael Hudson: BRICS Earthquake, Dollar Tumbles as China Walks Away from US Debt

Dialogue Works

Richard Wolff & Michael Hudson: BRICS Earthquake, Dollar Tumbles as China Walks Away from US Debt

Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:

  1. What is your take on Donald Trump’s claim that BRICS is fading and his threat to impose 10% tariffs on member nations?
  2. How do current U.S. policies, especially under Trump, affect the global standing and value of the dollar?
  3. Can you explain the significance of the Financial Times article showing declining foreign holdings of U.S. Treasuries, especially by China?
  4. What explains the sharp rise in U.S. Treasury holdings reported by the Cayman Islands?
  5. How are global political shifts, such as rising nationalism in Japan and Europe, influenced by U.S. economic and trade policies?


Michael Hudson:

  1. Trump’s policies—tariffs, inflation, monopoly tolerance—are driving foreign investors out of dollar assets, accelerating the dollar’s decline despite higher interest rates.
  2. The dollar is falling because investors see U.S. policy as destabilizing; they’re moving into gold, Bitcoin, and other safe assets, not because of economic strength but fear of loss.
  3. The Cayman Islands’ rising Treasury holdings reflect offshore financial flows, often from illicit sources like tax evasion, dictators, or crypto scams funneled through U.S. bank branches.
  4. U.S. weapon systems are being exposed as ineffective in Ukraine and the Middle East, undermining the arms export economy that was meant to sustain global dollar demand.
  5. The post-WWII Bretton Woods system is unraveling; just as the U.S. replaced the British pound, emerging powers are now building alternatives to dollar dominance, which U.S. threats can’t stop.


Richard Wolff:

  1. Trump’s belief that devaluing the dollar boosts exports ignores that the U.S. has deindustrialized—there’s little left to export, making the policy self-defeating.
  2. Harsh U.S. immigration and ICE policies are deterring tourism and foreign real estate investment, reducing demand for dollars and contributing to its decline.
  3. Countries like Japan and Canada are using non-tariff barriers—cultural and political resistance—to reject U.S. goods, despite trade deals, showing limits of American leverage.
  4. The U.S. is alienating allies with tariffs and erratic policies, pushing them toward BRICS and new economic alignments as a defense against American economic instability.
  5. The decline of American empire is clear in military weakness (e.g., inability to sustain long wars) and loss of ideological influence, mirrored in the rise of left and right nationalist movements abroad.

More episodes

View all episodes

  • Prof. Ted Postol: Iran Already Achieved NUCLEAR DETERRENCE Against Israel

    01:09:20|
    Analysis of a Middle East conflict suggests reported jet losses may reflect a deliberate strategy: absorbing early damage while preserving hidden air defenses for ambush-style engagements. The discussion highlights how intermittent threats can reduce pilot effectiveness and shift battlefield dynamics over time. It also argues that missile defense systems are being misused, wasting resources against ballistic threats while drones become increasingly decisive. With advanced satellite support and real-time drone guidance, precision strikes are improving. The interview warns that escalation could lead to catastrophic regional and global consequences, especially if energy systems are disrupted or nuclear conflict emerges.
  • Larry Johnson & Col. Wilkerson: Fighter Jet SHOT DOWN — Iran War SPIRALS OUT OF CONTROL

    01:04:41|
    This interview analyzes the escalating Middle East conflict, arguing the war lacks clear strategic goals and is driven more by destruction than achievable outcomes. It highlights how recent U.S. statements effectively push global actors toward negotiating with Iran, especially over control of the Strait of Hormuz. The discussion explores shifting alliances, Europe’s partial break from U.S. policy, and the growing role of regional diplomacy led by countries like Oman and Pakistan. It also raises concerns about misinformation, internal divisions, and alleged covert operations. A key takeaway is that continued conflict may accelerate nuclear proliferation, with Iran likely pursuing deterrence, potentially reshaping global power dynamics.
  • Amb. Chas Freeman: Trump PUSHES ESCALATION — Israel’s Strategy COLLAPSES Overnight

    58:28|
    This interview analyzes the escalating Middle East conflict, arguing the war lacks clear objectives and is driven more by destruction than strategy. It highlights how recent developments, especially around the Strait of Hormuz, are pushing global powers toward negotiating with Iran rather than relying on military force. The discussion explores shifting alliances, growing divisions between the U.S. and Europe, and the role of regional players like Oman and Pakistan in potential diplomacy. It also examines internal tensions within Israel and questions the effectiveness of ongoing military strategies. Ultimately, the conversation warns that continued conflict may accelerate nuclear proliferation and reshape global power dynamics.
  • Andrei Martyanov: IT’S OVER: The U.S. Just LOST to Iran… Here’s Why

    45:29|
    The interview discusses escalating tensions in the Middle East, focusing on threats of intensified U.S. military action against Iran. It portrays the situation as a strategic and political failure, arguing that attacks on civilian infrastructure reflect desperation rather than strength. The conversation highlights concerns about potential heavy casualties, lack of preparedness for modern warfare, and internal political pressures driving decisions. It also emphasizes shifting global power dynamics, with Iran gaining influence and regional alliances evolving. Overall, the discussion frames the conflict as a dangerous turning point with global consequences and growing instability.
  • Pepe Escobar: Iran Just CHANGED the Balance of Power in the Middle East

    01:03:57|
    A heated discussion examines the escalating conflict involving Iran, describing it as a broader war impacting civilians and infrastructure. The speakers strongly criticize U.S. leadership claims, arguing attacks target critical facilities and reflect strategic failure. They highlight shifting regional dynamics, including fractures among Middle Eastern allies and growing roles of powers like Russia and China. The conversation warns of severe global economic consequences if escalation continues, while suggesting Iran may intensify retaliation. Overall, the interview portrays a rapidly evolving conflict with high risks, limited diplomatic options, and long-term geopolitical consequences.
  • Alex Krainer: Trump TRAPPED in Iran War - The Exit Plan Is Falling Apart…

    01:11:17|
    This discussion examines escalating U.S.–Iran tensions following a recent presidential address that repeated threats of intensified military action while claiming progress. The speakers criticize the rhetoric as provocative and lacking credibility, arguing markets and global reactions show declining trust. They suggest economic motives—especially debt pressure, oil prices, and financial system stability—are key drivers behind policy decisions. The conversation highlights risks of rising energy costs, global instability, and wider conflict, while questioning the influence of financial institutions and media narratives. It concludes that prolonged conflict could worsen global inequality and reshape geopolitical alliances, with uncertain and potentially severe consequences.
  • Matthew Hoh: This One Move Against Iran Could Collapse Everything…

    57:10|
    Iran war analysis: Europe's reluctance to back US in Hormuz contrasts with 2003 Iraq, signaling multipolar shift. NATO's purpose questioned as alliance frays. Axis of Resistance uses decentralized strategy; Iran's mosaic defense thwarts conventional attacks. US ground ops deemed risky amid drone warfare. Gulf states weigh US ties vs regional realities. Economic fallout: recession risks, energy chaos. Does this conflict mark end of American century? Can 20th-century military thinking succeed in modern asymmetric warfare? Key discussion on geopolitical transition, alliance dynamics, and the high stakes of miscalculation in an increasingly fragmented global order.
  • Richard Wolff & Michael Hudson: Iran War Just BROKE the Global Economy & the US Empire

    53:39|
    Experts discuss US-Iran conflict escalation and global economic consequences. Critique of 'good vs bad' geopolitical framing amid potential oil market disruption. Analysis covers Iranian strategic responses, Hormuz tensions, and energy trade weaponization. Short-term market volatility contrasted with long-term structural shifts: de-dollarization, BRICS growth, and West Asian economic bloc emergence. Warning: US attempts to control global oil may accelerate Global South realignment, triggering worldwide crisis. Europe and Asia seek insulation from US policy volatility as dollar-dominated finance faces challenges. Rising energy costs could spark deflation abroad while creating inflationary pressures domestically, reshaping international trade for a post-Western economic order.
  • Scott Ritter: Iran REJECTS Ceasefire — US vs Iran: Missiles Rain Down in BRUTAL Escalation

    01:21:17|
    April 2026 Iran-US tensions: Expert analysis on military realities—ground invasion logistically impossible, Iran's strategic Strait of Hormuz control, advanced missile capabilities. Discussion covers intelligence failures, Russia as potential mediator, Israel/Gulf state dynamics. Key themes: regime change unachievable by force, Iran demanding lasting security guarantees and US withdrawal from Middle East, potential regional transformation. Broader implications: US munitions depletion impacts NATO/Pacific strategy, Iran positioned to compel American regional exit, reshaping global power balance. Dialogue examines how prolonged conflict weakens US military readiness worldwide while Iran leverages asymmetric advantages, with potential for Gulf monarchies to face unprecedented pressure and regional power structures to fundamentally shift.