Share
Dialogue Works
Dmitry Orlov: Is a MAJOR War Brewing Between the EU and Russia
•
Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:
- What were the outcomes of the latest round of negotiations between Russia and Ukraine?
- How should we interpret the recent protests in Ukraine, and what implications do they have for Russia?
- Does the West, particularly the US and Europe, care about who governs Ukraine after a settlement, and how do their differing approaches affect the situation?
- What is the significance of the Zangazur corridor, and could the US play a role in managing it, impacting Russia and Iran?
- How can we understand Turkey’s complex and often contradictory behavior in the region, especially regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, and the Middle East?
Dmitry Orlov:
- The talks occurred but achieved little—both sides remain too far apart for substantive negotiations. Russia proposed short humanitarian ceasefires to recover the dead and wounded, which Ukraine said they would consider. The Ukrainian delegation no longer follows Zelensky’s demands, signaling a shift toward more realistic, albeit limited, engagement.
- The protests in Ukraine are not organic but orchestrated "AstroTurf" events, funded and organized by political rivals like Poroshenko and Klitschko to challenge Zelensky. Participants are mostly young, paid individuals; older men avoid protests due to fear of conscription. This reflects Ukraine’s political instability and lack of genuine democratic process.
- Europe and the US have divergent interests: Europe takes an ideological stance, while Trump focuses on economic leverage. Trump pressured Europe to fund Ukraine’s war effort after the US withdrew support, exposing Europe’s inability or unwillingness to pay. This shift allows the US to blame Europe if Ukraine collapses, marking a strategic win for Trump and a diplomatic loss for Europe.
- The idea that the US will manage the Zangazur corridor is baseless "fake news." The corridor is strategically important for Iran as a cultural and recreational outlet, and for Azerbaijan as a land link to Turkey. However, merging Azerbaijan with Turkey risks destabilizing both due to deep ethnic and regional divisions within Azerbaijan, making such integration problematic.
- Turkey’s behavior stems from its fractured identity—balancing secular Ataturk-era nationalism with Islamist influences like the Muslim Brotherhood. Historically prone to internal betrayal, Turkey is now less controllable by the US, especially since Putin helped Erdogan survive a coup attempt. Russia manages Turkey as an untrustworthy neighbor, expecting betrayal but avoiding overreaction.
More episodes
View all episodes
Prof. Ted Postol: Iran Already Achieved NUCLEAR DETERRENCE Against Israel
01:09:20|Analysis of a Middle East conflict suggests reported jet losses may reflect a deliberate strategy: absorbing early damage while preserving hidden air defenses for ambush-style engagements. The discussion highlights how intermittent threats can reduce pilot effectiveness and shift battlefield dynamics over time. It also argues that missile defense systems are being misused, wasting resources against ballistic threats while drones become increasingly decisive. With advanced satellite support and real-time drone guidance, precision strikes are improving. The interview warns that escalation could lead to catastrophic regional and global consequences, especially if energy systems are disrupted or nuclear conflict emerges.
Larry Johnson & Col. Wilkerson: Fighter Jet SHOT DOWN — Iran War SPIRALS OUT OF CONTROL
01:04:41|This interview analyzes the escalating Middle East conflict, arguing the war lacks clear strategic goals and is driven more by destruction than achievable outcomes. It highlights how recent U.S. statements effectively push global actors toward negotiating with Iran, especially over control of the Strait of Hormuz. The discussion explores shifting alliances, Europe’s partial break from U.S. policy, and the growing role of regional diplomacy led by countries like Oman and Pakistan. It also raises concerns about misinformation, internal divisions, and alleged covert operations. A key takeaway is that continued conflict may accelerate nuclear proliferation, with Iran likely pursuing deterrence, potentially reshaping global power dynamics.
Amb. Chas Freeman: Trump PUSHES ESCALATION — Israel’s Strategy COLLAPSES Overnight
58:28|This interview analyzes the escalating Middle East conflict, arguing the war lacks clear objectives and is driven more by destruction than strategy. It highlights how recent developments, especially around the Strait of Hormuz, are pushing global powers toward negotiating with Iran rather than relying on military force. The discussion explores shifting alliances, growing divisions between the U.S. and Europe, and the role of regional players like Oman and Pakistan in potential diplomacy. It also examines internal tensions within Israel and questions the effectiveness of ongoing military strategies. Ultimately, the conversation warns that continued conflict may accelerate nuclear proliferation and reshape global power dynamics.
Andrei Martyanov: IT’S OVER: The U.S. Just LOST to Iran… Here’s Why
45:29|The interview discusses escalating tensions in the Middle East, focusing on threats of intensified U.S. military action against Iran. It portrays the situation as a strategic and political failure, arguing that attacks on civilian infrastructure reflect desperation rather than strength. The conversation highlights concerns about potential heavy casualties, lack of preparedness for modern warfare, and internal political pressures driving decisions. It also emphasizes shifting global power dynamics, with Iran gaining influence and regional alliances evolving. Overall, the discussion frames the conflict as a dangerous turning point with global consequences and growing instability.
Pepe Escobar: Iran Just CHANGED the Balance of Power in the Middle East
01:03:57|A heated discussion examines the escalating conflict involving Iran, describing it as a broader war impacting civilians and infrastructure. The speakers strongly criticize U.S. leadership claims, arguing attacks target critical facilities and reflect strategic failure. They highlight shifting regional dynamics, including fractures among Middle Eastern allies and growing roles of powers like Russia and China. The conversation warns of severe global economic consequences if escalation continues, while suggesting Iran may intensify retaliation. Overall, the interview portrays a rapidly evolving conflict with high risks, limited diplomatic options, and long-term geopolitical consequences.
Alex Krainer: Trump TRAPPED in Iran War - The Exit Plan Is Falling Apart…
01:11:17|This discussion examines escalating U.S.–Iran tensions following a recent presidential address that repeated threats of intensified military action while claiming progress. The speakers criticize the rhetoric as provocative and lacking credibility, arguing markets and global reactions show declining trust. They suggest economic motives—especially debt pressure, oil prices, and financial system stability—are key drivers behind policy decisions. The conversation highlights risks of rising energy costs, global instability, and wider conflict, while questioning the influence of financial institutions and media narratives. It concludes that prolonged conflict could worsen global inequality and reshape geopolitical alliances, with uncertain and potentially severe consequences.
Matthew Hoh: This One Move Against Iran Could Collapse Everything…
57:10|Iran war analysis: Europe's reluctance to back US in Hormuz contrasts with 2003 Iraq, signaling multipolar shift. NATO's purpose questioned as alliance frays. Axis of Resistance uses decentralized strategy; Iran's mosaic defense thwarts conventional attacks. US ground ops deemed risky amid drone warfare. Gulf states weigh US ties vs regional realities. Economic fallout: recession risks, energy chaos. Does this conflict mark end of American century? Can 20th-century military thinking succeed in modern asymmetric warfare? Key discussion on geopolitical transition, alliance dynamics, and the high stakes of miscalculation in an increasingly fragmented global order.
Richard Wolff & Michael Hudson: Iran War Just BROKE the Global Economy & the US Empire
53:39|Experts discuss US-Iran conflict escalation and global economic consequences. Critique of 'good vs bad' geopolitical framing amid potential oil market disruption. Analysis covers Iranian strategic responses, Hormuz tensions, and energy trade weaponization. Short-term market volatility contrasted with long-term structural shifts: de-dollarization, BRICS growth, and West Asian economic bloc emergence. Warning: US attempts to control global oil may accelerate Global South realignment, triggering worldwide crisis. Europe and Asia seek insulation from US policy volatility as dollar-dominated finance faces challenges. Rising energy costs could spark deflation abroad while creating inflationary pressures domestically, reshaping international trade for a post-Western economic order.
Scott Ritter: Iran REJECTS Ceasefire — US vs Iran: Missiles Rain Down in BRUTAL Escalation
01:21:17|April 2026 Iran-US tensions: Expert analysis on military realities—ground invasion logistically impossible, Iran's strategic Strait of Hormuz control, advanced missile capabilities. Discussion covers intelligence failures, Russia as potential mediator, Israel/Gulf state dynamics. Key themes: regime change unachievable by force, Iran demanding lasting security guarantees and US withdrawal from Middle East, potential regional transformation. Broader implications: US munitions depletion impacts NATO/Pacific strategy, Iran positioned to compel American regional exit, reshaping global power balance. Dialogue examines how prolonged conflict weakens US military readiness worldwide while Iran leverages asymmetric advantages, with potential for Gulf monarchies to face unprecedented pressure and regional power structures to fundamentally shift.