Share

cover art for Andrei Martyanov: IT’S OVER: Iran & Russia Just Made Their Boldest Move Yet

Dialogue Works

Andrei Martyanov: IT’S OVER: Iran & Russia Just Made Their Boldest Move Yet

Analysis of escalating US-Iran tensions under Trump, examining military realities: US lacks capacity for successful invasion of Iran due to nightmarish terrain, robust Iranian air defenses, and risk of devastating asymmetric retaliation against regional bases and Israel. Iran's doctrine has shifted offensive after demonstrating resilience in recent conflicts. Discussion covers Turkey's precarious multi-vector diplomacy, Arab states' vulnerability, and Israel's dependence on US support for any strike capability. On Ukraine, Russia maintains firm political objectives—achievable diplomatically or militarily—with US remaining a co-belligerent despite Trump's attempted exit. New START treaty expiration heightens nuclear risks, though deterrence prevents direct confrontation. The world is undergoing volatile transition toward multipolarity, with BRICS and SCO forming the nucleus of a new global order as Western hegemony decays. Nuclear weapons paradoxically provide stability amid great power realignment.

More episodes

View all episodes

  • Larry C. Johnson & Col. Larry Wilkerson: The New Axis? Russia, Iran War Shield & China’s WARNING

    01:01:34|
    Analysis of stalled US-Iran negotiations reveals deep mutual distrust following last year's failed talks. Discussion of the limited US naval presence in the region—just one carrier and three destroyers—suggests military action would be disastrous given Iran's defensive capabilities and potential Russian-Chinese response. Assessment that economic warfare, not diplomacy, drives US policy: deliberate creation of dollar shortages triggered bank collapses and currency freefall to provoke unrest. Broader context includes China-Russia coordination on alternative financial systems (CIPS) challenging dollar dominance, and Europe's self-destructive energy policies. Critical examination of US hypocrisy: Iran has killed virtually no Americans since 1979 while US actions (including enabling Saddam's chemical weapons use) contributed to hundreds of thousands of Iranian deaths. The nuclear issue masks regime change objectives
  • Amb. Chas Freeman: Negotiations… or the Brink of All-Out War?

    54:34|
    Analysis of escalating US-Iran tensions under Trump administration. Ambassador discusses incoherent policy lacking strategy, with Kushner/Witkoff-led Oman negotiations facing Iran's non-negotiable positions on enrichment, missiles, and regional alliances. Gulf Arab states and Turkey actively oppose war, viewing Israel—not Iran—as the region's primary instability source. China and Russia offer limited support but won't militarily defend Tehran. US interests in West Asia have sharply declined except for Israel alliance and transit routes, with Washington increasingly serving Israeli hegemonic aims. No Congressional debate on potential conflict despite military buildup. Iran maintains credible deterrent posture while facing domestic economic pressures. A lose-lose scenario looms with no clear exit strategy for Washington.
  • Richard D. Wolff & Michael Hudson: Warning Signs: The U.S. Is Losing on Every Front

    01:01:28|
    Analysis of U.S. foreign policy as a symptom of imperial decline. Discussion covers illegal pressure on Iran (currency manipulation, sanctions), extrajudicial killings of Latin American fishermen, and violations of international law. Europe faces impossible choices: pay U.S. "tribute," gut social welfare to fund militarization, or break from NATO. Trump's tariffs failed—U.S. manufacturing jobs fell 70,000 while Chinese exports to the rest of the world hit record highs. Energy shortages (copper, electricity) threaten both AI ambitions and military capacity. The West's desperation contrasts with BRICS expansion and shifting global trade toward China. A civilizational crisis of law, economics, and power.
  • Alex Krainer: Iran Says “No” — Trump’s Strategy Crumbles

    54:59|
    Analysis of escalating US-Iran tensions reveals military buildup as strategic theater rather than prelude to war. Trump administration appears committed to negotiating directly with Tehran while rejecting regime change agendas pushed by globalist interests. Shift from British free-trade system toward Hamiltonian economic model explains Washington's recalibration. Europe increasingly sidelined as US-Iran talks advance in Oman—echoing JCPOA's collapse where Europeans benefited while America enforced sanctions. Iran positioned as West Asia's security anchor alongside Russia and China. Epstein file revelations trigger political fallout in UK establishment. Ukraine negotiations progressing trilaterally; Europe's future role hinges on domestic political shifts toward sovereignty movements rather than current leadership hostile to Moscow. Truth emerging from classified files may accelerate institutional erosion of the old global order.
  • Scott Ritter: Game Over? Trump’s Iran Strategy Might Blow Up and Start a Regional War

    01:00:44|
    Analysis of escalating US-Iran tensions following Rubio's demand that Iran limit ballistic missiles—a non-starter since missiles deter Israeli attacks. Discussion covers how domestic US politics (midterms, Trump's vulnerability) prevent military action despite bluster. Iran maintains dual-track approach: negotiating on nuclear issues while refusing missile concessions, knowing they're existential for regime survival. Regional dynamics shifting as Turkey pivots toward Iran, Arab states fear regional war's economic devastation, and Iran deepens military-technical cooperation with Russia after Western hostility pushed it East. Ukraine talks examined as tools to pressure Kyiv toward capitulation, not genuine peace. New START treaty expiration at midnight triggers new nuclear arms race. Europe awakening to US—not Russia or China—as primary threat after Greenland incident exposes Washington's unreliability.
  • Stanislav Krapivnik: Russia & Iran Just Crossed a Line

    01:06:13|
    Analysis of Ukraine's deteriorating battlefield position as offensives shrink yearly due to manpower/equipment shortages. Zaporozhye identified as critical weak point where Ukrainian defenses may collapse. Western involvement deeper than acknowledged—Americans/Europeans directly operating HIMARS, Patriots and other systems. Russian military transformed into world's most combat-experienced force with effective rotation systems and volunteer recruitment, while Ukraine faces mass desertions. Economically, Russia functions as self-sufficient manufacturing power while Europe cut itself off from critical supply chains it cannot replace. On Iran: US/Israel lack capacity to destroy Iran militarily despite regional buildup; Iranian defenses bolstered by Russian S-300/400 systems and Chinese support. Strait of Hormuz closure would trigger global supply shock—not price spike—potentially collapsing European economies entirely.
  • Col. Larry Wilkerson: Trump Caves Under Pressure — Iran’s Capabilities Now Bigger Than Ever

    59:19|
    Analysis of escalating US-Iran tensions amid military buildup in the Persian Gulf. Despite drone incidents and warships deployed, assessment suggests Trump is bluffing—not preparing for actual conflict—as no "quick decisive strike" option exists without triggering wider regional war. Netanyahu and Israel identified as primary obstacle to diplomacy, demanding unrealistic concessions like zero enrichment and missile disarmament that would leave Iran defenseless. Discussion covers Iran's legitimate security concerns, risks of accidental escalation, and how sanctions fuel instability. Russia-Iran ties strengthening while Putin remains constrained by Ukraine war. Broader critique: US foreign policy increasingly serves Israeli interests over American national security, draining Ukrainian lives to tie down Russia while ignoring opportunities for JCPOA-style diplomacy. Warning that miscalculation could trigger oil market collapse ($300/barrel) and global economic shock. Domestic US political pressures further complicate prospects for de-escalation.
  • Patrick Henningsen: Is a US-Iran War Really Inevitable? Iran Could Devastate the Attacks!

    01:04:01|
    Analysis of escalating US-Israel-Iran tensions reveals a fragile "tactical pause" rather than genuine de-escalation. Israel demands regime change and Iran's partition, while Washington faces massive risks with minimal short-term gains from military action. Iran has achieved maximum deterrence—its missile capabilities could overwhelm Israeli defenses in sustained conflict, potentially fracturing Israeli society. The situation involves six to seven regional actors, not just three parties. Meanwhile, Russia-Iran-China alignment is rapidly deepening through economic corridors and energy ties, making Iran increasingly "sanction-proof." Arab Gulf states fear devastation from regional war and resist enabling US-Israel aggression. Critically, the US envoy lacks credibility after deceiving Tehran before Israel's June attack. With Trump's transactional approach prioritizing Israel over US interests, and Pentagon planners warning of a prolonged attrition war—not a quick victory—the path to conflict remains dangerously open despite mounting political costs at home.