Share

cover art for Social Movements and Profit Opportunities

Cato Daily Podcast

Social Movements and Profit Opportunities

Serving the underserved is a well-established path to profits for entrepreneurs and acceptance for minority populations. Economist Nathan Goodman explains.

More episodes

View all episodes

  • The Ever-Expanding Definition of 'Public Health'

    10:30
    The One Weird Trick of public health advocacy seems to be to define as much as possible as a public health concern to justify massive intervention into the lives of Americans. Jeff Singer explains.
  • Two Problems That Vanish with the End of Cannabis Prohibition

    09:54
    Most Americans have access to either medical or recreational cannabis, but prohibition at the federal level persists, and that prohibition keeps in place at least two big problems. Paul Best explains.
  • Regulating AI and Free Expression

    13:58
    David Inserra says looming regulation of artificial intelligence has huge implications for the future of free expression.
  • Social Security Still Poses Massive Fiscal Risks

    22:20
    The fiscal picture for the federal government is increasingly dire. Social Security’s worsening finances figure prominently in that story. Cato's Romina Boccia and Brian Riedl of the Manhattan Institute tell the tale.
  • What about the Feds’ Junk Fees?

    08:32
    The federal government has its own problematic junk fees, according to Cato's Nick Anthony.
  • More Thoughts on Trump v. United States

    17:36
    It's hard to get a handle on the breadth of protections handed to current and future presidents in Trump v. United States. Cato's Walter Olson says much of the immunity from prosecution handed to these heads of state is wholly invented by SCOTUS.
  • The NetChoice Cases Deliver Win for Freedom of Speech

    11:17
    State laws seeking to compel social media companies to allow certain content or people on their platforms failed to pass muster at the Supreme Court. Jennifer Huddleston evaluates what's next.
  • 'Jawboning' and Murthy v. Missouri

    20:33
    In Murthy v. Missouri, the Supreme Court clarified the evidence that would be required to prove government coercion with respect to online speech platforms. Cato's Walter Olson and Brent Skorup discuss the case.
  • Adjudicating Federal Agency Claims after Jarkesy

    23:24
    The Supreme Court's Jarkesy decision will mean more cases brought federal agencies will end up in court instead of the court-like rooms inside the agencies themselves. Will Yeatman of the Pacific Legal Foundation and Cato’s Jennifer Schulp explain the importance of the change.