Breaking Down: Collapse

Replaying episode 6: The Financial System

Replaying Episode 71: Catabolic Collapse

Replaying Episode 4: Limits to Growth

Replaying Episode 3: "Energy"

Continuing the series started yesterday - replaying the first 8 episodes while I'm on vacation, and will give insights into each episode when I get back.

I'm out on vacation, but thought I'd try something new - we'll be replaying the first 8 episodes of the podcast over the next week, and then I'll go through one by one and revisit them - giving commentary on my thoughts on what's changed since.

A discussion on Christopher Ketcham's article describing the idea of Solastalgia, as we head towards a world that could lose 2-4 billion people, just from climate change by 2050 (according to actuarial scientists).Two Billion Dead at 2C Warming? - CounterPunch.orgplanetary-solvency-risks-and-recommendations.pdf (PDF Download)Global economy could face 50% loss in GDP between 2070 and 2090 from climate shocks, say actuaries | Climate crisis | The GuardianLetter: CCC letter to Minister Hardy - advice on the UK's adaptation objectives - Climate Change Committee

The first 15 minutes or so of my episode with Abbie, who spoke with me about their decision to move outside of the US with their partner. Join us Patreon to hear the full episode!

What responsibilities do scientists have to be blunt about the reality of climate change? Is it better to keep society calm and not explore worst case scenarios, or is it their duty to scare people? I explore that question, and dive into new research done by two scientific societies that lies outside of socially acceptable scientific consensus.Why Isn't Everybody Panicking? Scientific Reticence and the Duty to Scare People - The Prindle Institute for EthicsGlobal Warming At 3 °C By 2050? What's Behind The New German Climate Warning - WorldcrunchGemeinsamer Aufruf der DMG und der DPG — DPG (Translate to English on your browser)