{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/f5b64019-68c3-57d4-b70b-043e63e5cbf6/6ae387cb39c71ad17434c478?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"How AIPAC and AI Spent Their Money This Midterm Election","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/61b775cb169562bbade950d2/1793304380813-e649c293-7915-4cab-8bfe-64d3dc23272f.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>It’s a superlative achieved again and again: The current election cycle is the <a href=\"https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/2026-midterms-become-expensive-election-cycle-ever-rcna605964\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">most expensive</a> on record, according to AdImpact, likely to be surpassed only by the next one. <a href=\"https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/26/politics/elon-musk-campaign-spending\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">North of $16 billion</a> have been raised ahead of Tuesday’s looming elections, with ad spending in House and Senate races topping <a href=\"https://www.npr.org/2026/10/19/nx-s1-6004922/democrats-republicans-elon-musk-super-pacs-campaign-fundraising\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">$4 billion</a>. Mega-donors this election season have overwhelmingly backed Republicans with contributions largely flowing from AI, crypto, and <a href=\"https://theintercept.com/2026/10/09/kalshi-polymarket-betting-prediction-election/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">online gambling</a> interests.</p><p>The Intercept tracked how super PAC spending is flowing into the midterms and how growing public skepticism of special-interest money in politics is affecting campaign strategies. Hundreds of candidates are <a href=\"https://theintercept.com/2026/10/29/aipac-israel-midterms-spending-elections-congress/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">still taking donations from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee</a> and its super PAC, the United Democracy Project, despite public sentiment turning against the pro-Israel lobby.</p><p>“The data overall reveals that [AIPAC is] still spending a ton of money on a lot of races, and more often than not, their candidates are still winning,” Intercept managing editor Maia Hibbett told The Intercept Briefing. “It is still quite meaningful money.”</p><p><a href=\"https://theintercept.com/2026/10/29/midterms-election-money-ai-super-pac/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Artificial intelligence super PACs</a> have also poured tens of millions of dollars into this election cycle, most of it on just a few races in the primaries. The two leading AI super PAC networks, affiliated with OpenAI or Anthropic, dropped a whopping $50.7 million on the primaries, but are noticeably spending much less in the lead-up to the general election, $8.5 million — likely responding to public backlash in the same way that AIPAC has.</p><p>“The <a href=\"https://news.gallup.com/poll/709772/americans-oppose-data-centers-area.aspx\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">polls</a> are just so startling on the public&#39;s transformation on AI and data centers over the last year. ... The entire life cycle of these AI super PACs, which started about a year ago, has followed that evolution of the public&#39;s opinion,” said Intercept politics reporter Matt Sledge. “One of the things that&#39;s been really interesting in the general election races is ... candidates [trying] to paint themselves as the more pro-AI safety, pro-AI regulation candidate.”</p><p>This week on the podcast, host Jessica Washington speaks to Hibbett and Sledge about the spending trends in the most expensive election cycle to date and unpack the intended impact.</p><p>“No matter which party gets control of either or both houses of Congress, there will be a lot of people elected next week who got there on the backs of Big Tech and special interests,” said Hibbett.</p><p>“They’re backing a lot of people in safe seats who don&#39;t really have a tight election,” Sledge added. “The goal may just be to buy themselves a few friends in Congress, because sometimes in Congress, it&#39;s just as good to have a few people who can stop regulation as it is to have people who can shape and actually pass laws.” </p><p><strong>Full transcript: </strong>https://interc.pt/4f0HWSB </p><p>Keep our investigations free and fearless at <a href=\"https://join.theintercept.com/donate/Donate_Podcast?source=interceptedshoutout&amp;recurring_period=one-time\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">theintercept.com/join</a>. </p>","author_name":"The Intercept"}