{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/f5b64019-68c3-57d4-b70b-043e63e5cbf6/6ab59af3554d86cd55e22e5e?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The Blueprint for Democrats to Win Back Voters ","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/61b775cb169562bbade950d2/1790286572197-ca2578da-c531-46e0-b7a4-b5f5ec8ffcc7.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>It’s the year of the democratic socialist. But the group that helped start the earthquake currently transforming the Democratic Party almost didn&#39;t make it to 2026.</p><p>After suffering major losses last election cycle after a deluge of pro-Israel lobby spending, Justice Democrats, which supports progressive candidates getting elected to Congress, was on the verge of being written about in the past tense.</p><p>“Everyone sort of doubted that there was a comeback to be had. I think a lot of people, AIPAC included, saw last cycle as the harbinger for what&#39;s to come: They were on the rise, JD and the left were on the decline. For the first time ever, we didn&#39;t endorse a new candidate since our founding, and because we had to focus on defending against <a href=\"https://theintercept.com/2024/10/24/aipac-spending-congress-elections-israel/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">$100 million in spending from AIPAC</a>,” says communications director and spokesperson Usamah Andrabi. “The truth is, that moment was really — for lack of a better word — the apex of AIPAC&#39;s momentum and ability.”</p><p>But Justice Democrats resurrected itself, had its most successful primary season to date, and helped put democratic socialism on the map. So what changed?</p><p>The group says it won big this year, even being massively outspent, because it tapped into the brewing frustration among voters — frustration directed at Democratic Party leaders. “We understood as soon as Donald Trump won that clearly the Democratic establishment was unfit to fight back, and what voters were looking for as we&#39;ve seen throughout this cycle, is this amorphous fighter that they want,” says Andrabi. “That fight doesn&#39;t just look like, as we say so often, press releases and strongly worded letters. It looks like fighting corporate establishment. It looks like fighting AIPAC. It looks like fighting crypto and AI.”</p><p>This week on The Intercept Briefing, Andrabi speaks to host Akela Lacy about how the group that helped elect Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib has seen their candidates make impressive gains in the primaries, and how they&#39;re planning to leverage their wins — and what they can learn from their losses — beyond November.</p><p>This primary season, Justice Democrats endorsed 15 candidates; seven won, with democratic socialists knocking out three incumbents. That includes Darializa Avila Chevalier who toppled Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chair Adriano Espaillat in New York, Melat Kiros who beat Rep. Diana DeGette in Colorado, and state Rep. Donavan McKinney who took out Rep. Shri Thanedar in Michigan. Those three are all but guaranteed to head to Congress next year, along with the four other candidates who won.</p><p>“This work doesn&#39;t happen overnight. These losses don&#39;t happen overnight. It takes years and years to build this progress,” says Andrabi. “These candidates that we elected this cycle are giving you a blueprint on a silver platter on how to excite your base and how to energize your party. The Democratic Party can either listen to them or be forced to listen to them, as they have been this cycle when we beat them.”</p><p><strong>Full transcript: </strong>https://interc.pt/4rypFBt</p><p>Keep our investigations free and fearless at <a href=\"http://theintercept.com/join\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">theintercept.com/join</a>.</p>","author_name":"The Intercept"}