{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/d556eb54-6160-4c85-95f4-47d9f5216c49/6aed9cf92cf7bf4244912e07?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The Weekend Intelligence: When is a suit not a suit?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/62e286a934d4d93d6587424a/1793957048773-c58eb986-f873-4d19-91fb-abfad38515c9.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>From politics and finance to weather and reality TV, prediction markets are letting ordinary people bet on almost anything. But unlike traditional bookmakers, they list questions that are inherently subjective: Did Zelensky wear a suit? Did Ronaldo cry at the World Cup? It raises a thorny question: who, in the end, is the arbiter of truth?</p><p><br></p><p>Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+</p><p><br></p><p>For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.This podcast transcript is generated by third-party AI. It has not been reviewed prior to publication. We make no representations or warranties in relation to the transcript, its accuracy or its completeness, and we disclaim all liability regarding its receipt, content and use. If you have any concerns about the transcript, please email us at podcasts@economist.com.</p>","author_name":"The Economist"}