{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/b5fe8d16-7518-4208-861b-e1ec5ce88192/bef14ded-47dd-4c7d-ae0e-9d447c2528bb?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"From the archive – Noam Chomsky","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60ed7797f1734ba0e93d0e59/60ed78087d5e83001af5e1b9.jpg?height=200","description":"In this episode of Little Atoms from 2009, Noam Chomsky examines the Obama administration and asks what has really changed.\n\nChomsky describes the first term of the Bush administration as “off the spectrum” in both aggression and arrogance. US international prestige sank to the lowest point since measured. It is hardly surprising therefore that the next candidate should have moved towards the centre.\n\nViolent interventionism has gone hand in hand with American exceptionalism for centuries, says Chomsky. Obama’s ideology, according to Chomsky has been “less extreme but basically hasn’t changed.”\n\nChomsky explores the history and dangers of humanitarian intervention.\n\n“You can’t say it can never be benevolent but there is a heavy burden of proof. It makes sense to talk about the responsibility to protect, but it should not be left in the hands of violent, aggressive powers”.\n\nThe internet played a prominent role in changing popular activism and proliferating conspiracy theories under the Bush regime. Through the internet, the 9/11 movement diverted people away from activism on serious issues.\n\n“It stopped questions on things the administration would rather keep secret.”\n\nBut Obama has found the internet useful. Chomsky argues has it been “a very effective cult generator” and crucial in the construction of Brand Obama.\n\nObama, like Bush, used the internet to distract activists from protesting state crimes.","author_name":"Neil Denny"}