{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/a8a5a759-8cb1-52ad-b50a-8e08dcee4d1f/667bf924a17e96b00255c8bf?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Taking the stand: Emma's story","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/61ba187a1a8cbeaa483cf196/1719400541487-c38bf01a77a4bbf35aa5211ab970f8f6.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Two reports of rape. Two criminal trials. Two not guilty verdicts. Two men, cleared. Two women – torn apart. A Tortoise investigation has heard how two complainants, Grace*, and Emma*, experienced the justice system from the point their alleged rapist was charged to the moment they were told of the jury’s decision. At a time when a vanishingly small number of police-recorded rapes result in a criminal charge, access to the transcripts of these two trials has permitted a step-by-step analysis of how each woman’s case was prosecuted, how they were cross-examined by the defence, why in one case, a woman’s past sexual history was allowed to be put before a jury, and the “bad character” of one alleged rapist was not.</p><p><br></p><p><em>To find out more about Tortoise:</em></p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/tortoise/id1441428990\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Download</em></a><em> the Tortoise app - for a listening experience curated by our journalists</em></p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/channel/tortoise/id6442666997\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Subscribe</em></a><em> to Tortoise+ on Apple Podcasts for early access and ad-free content</em></p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://www.tortoisemedia.com/join-us/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Become a member</em></a><em> and get access to all of Tortoise's premium audio offerings and more</em></p>","author_name":"The Observer"}