{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/a8a5a759-8cb1-52ad-b50a-8e08dcee4d1f/65081a49cb582e0011a42573?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"William and Murdoch: the prince and the press baron","description":"<p>Earlier this year, when the media went into a frenzy about the rift between the royal brothers and the publication of Harry's book Spare Paul Caruana Galizia started looking into a different aspect of the story. One that wasn't getting much attention: Prince Harry’s legal battles with the press. Then in April a new story emerged from that fight. It attracted a brief flurry of interest before seeming to drop out of sight. It was just a line in Prince Harry's court filings, but an extraordinary one: in a sworn statement Prince Harry said that his brother, Prince William, had privately settled his <em>own</em> phone hacking claim with Rupert Murdoch's News Group Newspapers for \"a large sum of money\". The Palace didn't deny it; nor did News Group. And it suddenly felt like the real story was only just emerging. A story not about Prince Harry but about Prince William, about the wider Royal family, and above all, about secrecy. But once again it’s a story that no-one seems to be going after.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>For the premium Tortoise listening experience, curated by our journalists, download the free Tortoise audio app.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>For early and ad-free access, subscribe to Tortoise+ on Apple Podcasts.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>If you’d like to further support slow journalism and help us build a different kind of newsroom, do consider donating to Tortoise at tortoisemedia.com/support-us. Your contributions allow us to investigate, campaign and explore, and to build a newsroom that is responsible and sustainable. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.</p>","author_name":"The Observer"}