{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/a3c828c3-73ec-4a4b-995c-958894896ec0/6ad8befb85adacac7dd0110b?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Does 'nothing beat in person work'?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/611e766b06c05e99e7f4093f/1792589484783-7e3d44ed-a805-4a17-ae45-40f67a2c9227.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Has hybrid working been a disaster? Should we stop pretending and get back to the office? That is the claim of <a href=\"https://link.amazon/B0h8odlQn\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">In-Person, a new book by Natalia Emanuel and Emma Harrington.</a></p><p><br></p><p>I read the book with interest. Despite entering with an open mind, I wasn&#39;t wholly convinced by the evidence. The authors seem to be challenging fully remote work, rather than hybrid work. Additionally the whole book seems to come with an ulterior motive, intent on trying to score points rather than reflect on the best way to work.</p><p><br></p><p>Natalia Emanuel agreed to chat with me to debate the evidence - it proves to be an engaging discussion. </p>","author_name":"brucedaisley.com"}