{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/92a301e1-443b-435f-b4e2-2e2dd1e37fc5/caba7a79-0a72-480e-a11c-13e7f445b4ab?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Is David Cameron reverting to type?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/61ba0ebd1a8cbe463c3cf145/61ba0f0b5ca4d10013ec5c7e.jpg?height=200","description":"Phil Collins is in the hot seat this week and is joined by Rachel Sylvester, Daniel Finkelstein and Hugo Rifkind. \n\nRachel Sylvester assess David Cameron reverting to type on his current stance on welfare, immigration, crime, Europe and pensioners. \n\nNigel Farage recently suggested that Enoch Powell's \"basic principle\" - that immigration causes tension - is still relevant today. Hugo Rifkind argues this is not the case.\n\nDaniel Finkelstein argues for a hypothecated NHS tax to ease the pressure of increasing demand on the ageing health service.\n\nSubscribe in iTunes: itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/did-you-read \nSubscribe to The Times: www.thetimes.co.uk","author_name":"Times Radio"}