{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/8b9264c0-ea6a-41c3-84cd-9d7b350986e2/632b1d11c2b909001438e2a2?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Muddle of the middle: why mid-career scientists feel neglected","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/61b9f3c11a8cbe2f7e3cedcf/fed4d03d-51a1-4550-8612-e842d8c9d802.jpg?height=200","description":"<p>Is 40 too young for a scientist to describe themselves as mid-career? If the term can’t be defined by age, does it refer to landing tenure, to achieving a level of autonomy or to serving on multiple academic committees?</p><p><br></p><p>Working scientists who no longer define themselves as ‘early career’ tell Julie Gould what this often-neglected career stage means to them in the absence of an agreed definition from funding agencies and scientific governing bodies.</p><p><br></p><p>This is the first episode in Muddle of the Middle, a six-part Working Scientist podcast series about the mid-career stage in science.</p>","author_name":"Nature Careers"}