{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6b2fc9ba-b9b7-4b7a-b980-e0024facd926/63c00f66e1da89001134dd77?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Is Rishi Sunak's anti-strike law a trap for Labour?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/61b9f75c1a8cbe0c083cee79/show-cover.jpg?height=200","description":"<p>After the Prime Minister and the leader of the opposition met across the despatch box for the first time in 2023, Anoosh Chakelian is joined by the&nbsp;<em>New Statesman</em>'s Political Editor Andrew Marr and Freddie Hayward to analyse whether Rishi Sunak can start turning his polling figures around.</p><p><br></p><p>They discuss Sunak’s answers about his use of private healthcare and Labour’s potentially costly plans for the NHS.</p><p><br></p><p>Then in You Ask Us, they answer a listener’s question on how Labour is responding to the government’s anti-strike legislation.</p><p><br></p><p>If you have a question for You Ask Us, go to <a href=\"newstatesman.com/youaskus\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">newstatesman.com/youaskus</a></p><p><br></p><p>Subscribe to the <em>Morning Call</em> newsletter at <a href=\"https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/morning-call \" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/morning-call </a></p><p><br></p><p><em>CORRECTION: </em></p><p>On an earlier version of this episode of the New Statesman podcast, during a discussion about anti-strike legislation, there was a suggestion that individual workers may be arrested – this was incorrect. As we made clear in our intro to the topic, the law would be enforceable in two ways: allowing employers to fire workers who strike, and to sue unions that don’t ensure a minimum level of service. We have removed this from the podcast. </p>","author_name":"The New Statesman"}