{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6a98a3f9d54ec943807fd7b7/6ade8fbf46e9bb4e0b088b7a?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The 69 Words Banned By General Motors","description":"<p>In 2008 General Motors circulated an internal presentation listing 69 words that employees were banned from using.</p><p><br></p><p>It’s not the typical sort of list that you might see in a company’s brand voice guidelines or corporate communications playbook. This thing reads like the glossary for a horror novel.</p><p><br></p><p>Graphic words like ‘apocalyptic’, ‘mangling’, ‘grenadlike’ and ‘disembowling’ make the list. So too ‘Hindenberg’ and – bizzarly – ‘Cobain’. But seemingly benign words like ‘safety’ and ‘critical’ are off limits too.</p><p><br></p><p>In this episode James and Charles explain why the list was circulated in the first place, and try to make sense of the words on it. They also have a broader discussion about how companies use language as a form of control, and attempt to describe one of the worst examples of graphic design on a PowerPoint presentation ever seen.</p><p><br></p><p>View the PowerPoint slide from hell here: https://wankernomics.com/shownotes</p>","author_name":"Wankernomics"}