{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6a4279cc5a160c9d6440d31e/6aa3e7e2b54f356fc7da19a7?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"US midterms: winds of fury","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6a4279cc5a160c9d6440d31e/1789126289216-9c050a20-376a-4bc9-9518-b22854e279e0.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>What happens to US defence funding if Democrats win the House?&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>In the final episode of this series of The Assessment, Charlie Edwards asks a conditional forecasting question: if Democrats hold a majority in the US House of Representatives on 3 January 2027, will Congress enact full-year FY2027 appropriations for the Department of Defense by 31 March?&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>An aggregate forecast from leading AI models puts the probability at just 34% — making this unlikely. But history points in the other direction: in 12 of the past 15 fiscal years, a full-year defence appropriation was enacted by the end of March.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Charlie is joined by Dana Allin, IISS Senior Fellow for US Foreign Policy and Editor of Survival, and Michael Shear, Chief UK Correspondent for <em>The New York Times</em> and former White House correspondent.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>They examine congressional dealmaking, the consequences of continuing resolutions for military readiness, disputes over Iran and presidential war powers and what prolonged budget dysfunction signals to US allies and adversaries.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Does the 34% forecast capture something the historical base rate misses?</p>","author_name":"IISS"}