{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6a21c23dac951431d77bc774/6a4b407b1e8214612a0605ee?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Ep:8 Love, Hierarchy, and the Anarchist Case Against the Couple Form","description":"<p>The anarchist tradition has spent a lot of time thinking about who controls the workplace, the land, the state. It has spent less time asking the same question about something closer and more uncomfortable: who controls the relationship?</p><p><br></p><p>Marriage, as a legal form, is not primarily about love. It is about property — inheritance, tax liability, the state's authority to decide which love is real and which families are legitimate. Emma Goldman understood this in her essay Marriage and Love: that the institution takes genuine human longing and organises it into ownership. She refused it her whole life, and privately burned with the jealousy and need that the structures she opposed had built inside her. That gap — between the world we argue for and the people we already are — is the most honest place to argue from.</p><p><br></p><p>Elizabeth Brake coined the term amatonormativity in 2012 to name the assumption that everyone is better off in an exclusive romantic couple — an assumption that structures law, economics, and inner life, and discriminates against almost everyone whose most important relationships don't fit the script. Andie Nordgren's relationship anarchy manifesto applies anarchist principles directly to intimate life: no ranking of people, no predetermined scripts, relationships designed consciously by the people inside them.</p><p><br></p><p>This episode also looks beyond the Western anarchist tradition. Across South Asia, West Africa, and Latin America, the nuclear couple has never been the dominant unit of care. The Hausa tradition of reciprocal support names something Kropotkin was arguing — mutual dependence as social foundation — lived in the texture of intimate life without the European theoretical vocabulary.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Topics: relationship anarchy, anarchism, amatonormativity, Emma Goldman, Andie Nordgren, Elizabeth Brake, free love, chosen family, care work, nuclear family, joint family, mutual aid, intimate politics, decolonisation.</em></p><p><br></p><p><strong>Further reading:</strong> — Emma Goldman, <em>Anarchism and Other Essays</em> (1910) — Voltairine de Cleyre, <em>They Who Marry Do Ill</em> (1907) — free at theanarchistlibrary.org — Elizabeth Brake, <em>Minimizing Marriage</em> (2012) — Andie Nordgren, <em>The Short Instructional Manifesto for Relationship Anarchy</em> (2006) — free at theanarchistlibrary.org — Sophie Lewis, <em>Full Surrogacy Now</em> (2019)</p>","author_name":"A thousand small fires"}