{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6a0c9e384c1aeb32e714e1b1/6a2836c8427484b4a445f4f4?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The People vs AI","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6a0c9e384c1aeb32e714e1b1/1781020058980-ff98034f-f218-46fb-ace1-4dd2dc1c5ff7.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>If the risks are so great, why are the AI firms continuing their race toward AGI? Geoffrey Hinton says the answer is simple: profit. The Observer’s Jamie Bartlett explores the dynamics of the race, and solutions such as Max Tegmark’s call for independent safety testing of AI firms. Technical solutions are being developed by pioneers like Yoshua Bengio, but experts warn time is limited. Ultimately, some believe only a \"Chernobyl scale disaster\" will compel governments to regulate the race.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Endgame </em>is supported by the Future of Life Institute.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>","author_name":"The Observer"}