{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/69f5e669ad98579289f5abc4/6a9186900911a5619717f32d?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The Science of YES: Why you are Persuading the Wrong Way","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/69f5e669ad98579289f5abc4/1787921958307-159e9182-3a14-49be-aa7a-5205997cc78e.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>You build a strong case. You bring the data. You explain your reasoning. And the other person still says they need to think about it.</p><p><br></p><p>Patrick van der Burght has spent 25 years explaining why that happens. He is a founding member of the Cialdini Institute, one of the top ranked Cialdini Certified Trainers in the world, and a business partner of Dr. Robert Cialdini. His clients include Google, Apple, Canva and Cisco.</p><p><br></p><p>🤫 How Productive are you Really? Take the Free Productivity Test - https://links.santiagotacoronte.com/Productivity-Assessment</p><p>🎁 More Free Productivity Tools and Templates - https://links.santiagotacoronte.com/free-productivity-resources</p><p>📩 Join my Productivity Newsletter - https://links.santiagotacoronte.com/Newsletter</p><p><br></p><p>In this episode he walks through the research on how people actually decide. Around 95% of decisions come from System 1, the fast intuitive part of the brain that runs on shortcuts. Yet when you sit down to write a pitch, an email or a proposal, you are consciously thinking, which means you are in System 2. So you produce logic and justification for a part of the brain that handles a fraction of the decisions. The result is not a no. It is an indecision, and Patrick argues those indecisions are where most of your lost yeses live.</p><p><br></p><p>He then walks through all seven universal principles of persuasion, with workplace examples for each: Reciprocity, Liking, Unity, Social Proof, Authority, Consistency and Scarcity. Santi pushes back on scarcity fatigue, brings a real case from a Swiss retailer that deleted 350,000 unverified reviews, and asks what happens to authority when people start trusting AI more than experts.</p><p><br></p><p>The through line is ethics. Manipulation removes choice. Persuasion surfaces the reasons a yes was already there. One holds when the boss leaves the room. The other does not.</p><p><br></p><p>- Around 95% of decisions are made by System 1, the fast, automatic, shortcut driven part of the brain. Attention spans have dropped from 20 minutes in the 1980s to about 7 seconds, which pushes that number higher every year.</p><p>- Most professional communication addresses System 2, the slow logical part, which handles roughly 5% of decisions. That mismatch creates uncertainty, and uncertain people postpone rather than refuse.</p><p>- Manipulation removes choice. Persuasion gives options and lets the yes surface on its own. When the decision comes from inside the other person, the behaviour holds without supervision.</p><p>- A gift with a condition attached is a reward, not a gift, and it does not trigger reciprocity. The downloadable ebook behind an email form is a lead magnet, not a favour.</p><p>- In a study on email negotiation, sharing personal information before talking business dropped deadlocked negotiations from 30% to 6%. The effect came from the number of similarities uncovered, not the volume of information shared.</p><p>- Do not introduce your own credentials. Have someone else do it, before you speak, so every sentence lands with the weight it deserves.</p><p>- The most persuasive average review score is 4.2 to 4.7. A perfect 5.0 reads as filtered or bought.</p><p>- The word \"because\" raised compliance in the photocopier queue study from roughly 64% to 93%, even when the reason that followed it carried no information.</p><p>- AI understands persuasion science but has no situational awareness. It does not know your relationship history, so it picks the wrong principle for the moment and invents supporting detail.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>💬 Guest Links:</p><p>Patrick van der Burght LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-van-der-burght/</p><p>Ethical Persuasion Unlocked podcast - https://ethicalpersuasion.com.au/podcast/</p><p>Patrick on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@ethicalpersuasion</p><p>Patrick on Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/ethical_persuasion/</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>","author_name":"Santiago Tacoronte"}