{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/69e74e7c07ecece42a32f22c/69e74e8b1e5fb1ae4645a2f5?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"#9 - This Company Banned Its Employees From Taking the Contraceptive Pill (And Won).","description":"<p>When the US Supreme Court ruled in favour of a company called Hobby Lobby in 2014, it was hailed by conservatives as a win for the religious freedom of business owners.</p><p><br></p><p>Critics of the decision said it dealt a major blow to the rights of employees to access reproductive healthcare.</p><p><br></p><p>But there's more to this case than meets the eye.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Has the Hobby Lobby case rewritten the rules about what a corporation actually is?</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Guest: </strong><a href=\"https://research.monash.edu/en/persons/steve-kourabas\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Associate Professor Steve Kourabas</a>, Deputy Director, Centre for Commercial Law and Regulatory Studies, Monash University</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Case: </strong><a href=\"https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/682/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.</a>, 573 U.S. 682 (2014)</p>","author_name":"MINIATURE"}