Safeguarding in sport is increasingly governed by legal frameworks — yet protection on the ground remains uneven.
In this episode, we examine the legal landscape of safeguarding in sport, exploring what standards and policies already exist, where gaps remain, and what is still needed to create safe sport environments. The discussion looks at the relationship between international frameworks and national regulations, highlighting inconsistencies, overlaps, and areas where accountability breaks down.
A central theme is enforcement. While many sport organisations have safeguarding policies, legal tools to prosecute violence committed by sport actors are often underused or poorly coordinated. The episode explores what options exist when interpersonal violence occurs, and the roles played by sport governing bodies, courts, and institutions such as the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
The conversation also examines whether anti-doping systems can serve as a model for safeguarding. Unlike anti-doping, safeguarding lacks binding international agreements, shared enforcement mechanisms, and clear legal authority. The episode discusses what lessons could be drawn — and where safeguarding fundamentally differs.
Broader legal and human rights frameworks used by international organisations are also explored as potential benchmarks for sport, alongside the responsibilities of sport governing bodies in prevention, response, and accountability.
This episode features Nikki Dryden, Olympic swimmer and human rights and sports lawyer, whose work spans safeguarding, gender inclusion, and athlete rights across international sport systems.
This episode was recorded in July 2025.
Further readings recommended by the guest in this episode:
• Allison Quigley's articles in the British Medical Journal about organisational changes that have to happen for safe sport to exist.
• \"Rescue Me\". Katherine Starr (2022).
• Andrew Jennings’ books.
","author_name":"SCORE Sport Think Tank"}