{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/69ab3b7c7036d739021982df/6a74f416237988582e6d92a9?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"AI Agent False Success: 3 Checks Before You Trust Done","description":"<p>For deeper playbooks and analysis: <a href=\"https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/</a></p><p><br></p><p>What's really happening when your AI agent says a task is done—but the result is wrong?</p><p><br></p><p>The common story is that AI systems hallucinate — but the reality is that agents can take real actions, substitute the wrong artifact, and confidently report success.</p><p>In this video, I share the inside scoop on how an agent recycled an old spreadsheet, why verifiable rewards can still produce false success, and how to build a stronger operating system around agent work.</p><p><br></p><ul><li>Why agent lying is different from chatbot hallucination</li><li>How a second agent can review actions and tool calls</li><li>What good supervision and harness work look like</li><li>Why you should ask boldly and verify quickly</li></ul><p><br></p><p>Operators, builders, marketers, and executives should care because the bottleneck is shifting from whether agents can act to whether their work can be trusted.</p><p>Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news.</p><p><br></p><p>Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.</p>","author_name":"Nate B. Jones"}