{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/69ab3b7c7036d739021982df/6a6022ebfa136e7931e8f750?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"AI Detection Can't Measure Meaning: What It Actually Sees","description":"<p>I sit down with Substack co-founder and CEO Chris Best for a wide-ranging conversation about AI slop, what it does to the public square, and how writers can use powerful tools without outsourcing their judgment.</p><p><br></p><p>We discuss Pangram's finding that roughly 40% of long-form writing on LinkedIn was fully AI-generated, why low-intent automation behaves like a denial-of-service attack on online communities, and what Substack is doing to add transparency without policing creators' tools.</p><p><br></p><p>The conversation also covers thin versus thick wrappers around AI, proof of work, Claude-fishing, the future of video, and why human attention may be the last truly scarce resource.</p><p><br></p><p>Chris Best: <a href=\"https://cb.substack.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://cb.substack.com</a> </p><p>Nate Jones: <a href=\"https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://natesnewsletter.substack.com</a></p>","author_name":"Nate B. Jones"}