{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/69ab3b7c7036d739021982df/69d17e313a785fb94b961c7e?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Wall Street Just Bet $285 Billion on AI Agents. The Best One Barely Works.","description":"<p>What's really happening with AI agents that claim to do the work for you?</p><p><br></p><p>The common story is that outcome-focused AI agents have finally arrived. The reality is that most of them still can't answer three basic questions.</p><p><br></p><p>In this video, I share the inside scoop on which AI agents actually deliver outcomes and which are still living on demo energy:</p><p><br></p><p> • Why verifiability is the hidden foundation of every real agent</p><p> • How three questions separate genuine agents from expensive hype</p><p> • What Lindy, Google Opal, Sauna, and Obvious actually get right</p><p> • Where the three-layer architecture points for builders who want control</p><p><br></p><p>Operators and builders who apply these three questions before committing will avoid the hype cycle and invest in tools that compound value over time.</p><p><br></p><p>Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news.</p><p>For playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/p/every-ai-agent-you-use-has-the-same?r=1z4sm5&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=web&amp;showWelcomeOnShare=true</p>","author_name":"Nate B. Jones"}