{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/69a47c08e1cf48c7c13c5ff3/6acebf8f39599f7c56134ea1?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The Thing about the Fly Is...","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/69a47c08e1cf48c7c13c5ff3/1791934340613-d4d084f0-f290-4294-8401-ebae3e3e18a6.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In today’s episode, we put two titan entry points of 1980s body horror into the arena: John Carpenter’s <em>The Thing</em> (1982) and David Cronenberg’s <em>The Fly</em> (1986). Only one can make our Essential Cut Watchlist.</p><p>We break down why <em>The Thing</em> is a masterclass in tension—a perfectly constructed pressure cooker of paranoia where there is no escape, and where characters are forced to perform inhuman acts just to prove their humanity.</p><p>Plus, Ian makes the case against <em>The Fly</em>, arguing that Cronenberg built two separate films: a classic sci-fi creature feature and an allegory for disease, aging, and mortality, with a tenuous bridge between them.</p><p>Which movie takes the crown? Tune in to find out!</p>","author_name":"Up Left Media"}