{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"","title":"Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons – Part 3: What the treaty promised—and what it left unresolved.","description":"A treaty is only as strong as its words and the will behind them. In the aftermath of the vote, the world examined every clause, searching for hope—or hidden peril. What, exactly, did the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons demand?\r\n\r\nAt its core, the treaty was uncompromising. It outlawed the development, testing, production, acquisition, possession, stockpiling, and use of nuclear weapons. It banned the transfer, deployment, and even the threat of use. For signatories, it meant a total rejection of nuclear weapons as tools of security or power. But the treaty was also ambitious in its humanitarian vision. It required help for victims of nuclear testing and use. It called for the cleanup of contaminated lands, acknowledging the lasting scars left by radioactive fallout. The preamble recognized the disproportionate suffering of women and indigenous peoples, rooting the treaty in the language of justice as well as law.\r\n\r\nLearn more at: https://thetreatyarchive.com/treaty/treaty-prohibition-nuclear-weapons","author_name":"The Archive Network"}