{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/699e36ed123f974082087563/69a1dd69bbda7540f470c358?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"SALT I (ABM Treaty) – Part 5: Legacy and Lessons for a Nuclear World","description":"Years after the signatures faded, the world looked back at the SALT I agreements with a mix of pride and doubt. Had these treaties truly made the world safer? Or were they only a brief pause in the relentless logic of the arms race? Now, history would deliver its verdict.\r\n\r\nThe ABM Treaty was the centerpiece, limiting each side to two missile defense sites, later reduced to one. By capping these systems, both the United States and the Soviet Union preserved the balance of terror—mutually assured destruction. The treaty’s message was clear: no side could launch a first strike and hope to escape retaliation. Alongside it, the Interim Agreement froze the number of missile launchers for five years, buying time for further diplomacy. But limitations soon became clear. Warhead numbers kept growing. New technologies—like MIRVs—multiplied destructive power far beyond what the treaties had imagined.\r\n\r\nLearn more at: https://thetreatyarchive.com/treaty/salt-i-abm-treaty","author_name":"The Archive Network"}