{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"","title":"Follow the Money: Conway’s Law Meets Financial Reality","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6992f6dad6c27a06bb23eada/1779123199015-48161a04-b268-4f53-91c9-577728b17df8.jpeg?height=200","description":"

Jamie Dobson and Ian Miell explore how “following the money” explains why software architecture mirrors funding models, incentives, and organizational structure, extending Conway’s Law into “Miell’s Law.” Jamie then interviews Sam Newman on why Conway’s Law resonates, why the Inverse Conway Maneuver is often misunderstood, and how architects should navigate uncertainty, AI, resilience, and basic financial curiosity.


Question of the week:   

Is architecture your problem or is it your financial model?


Horror Story of the week:   

Ian Miell describes a bank Kubernetes platform whose users multiplied rapidly while funding stayed flat, leaving the same team unable to meet escalating operational demands.


Interview of the week:   

Sam Newman – Conway’s Law’s limits, the flawed Inverse Conway Maneuver, and architecting for uncertainty and resilience.


Find out more about Container Solutions:


Learn more about our people:


If you enjoyed this episode then please either:

","author_name":"Container Solutions"}