{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/69612d9223ce58f14619a8f6/69612dcf1f21449d6decf269?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The Case Against Climate Reparations","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/69612d9223ce58f14619a8f6/f8da2b2605db26ff954b98c7c5ff598e.jpg?height=200","description":"<p>At this year’s annual UN conference on climate change, they are discussing “climate reparations,” wherein the rich countries that grew their wealth burning fossil fuels pay money to poorer and more vulnerable countries. It sounds sensible, but is the UN capable of administering something like this? And how much money are we talking here?</p><p><br></p><p>Guest: <a href=\"https://twitter.com/VVVijayEconBiz\">Vijay Vaitheeswaran</a>, global energy and climate innovation editor at The Economist.</p><p><br></p><p>Host: <a href=\"https://twitter.com/lizzieohreally\">Lizzie O’Leary</a></p><p><br></p><p>If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Dear Prudence—and you’ll be supporting the work we do here on What Next TBD. Sign up now at<a href=\"http://slate.com/whatnextplus\"> slate.com/whatnextplus</a> to help support our work.</p><p><br></p><p>Thanks <a href=\"http://avast.com/\">Avast.com</a>! Learn more about Avast One at <a href=\"http://avast.com/\">Avast.com</a></p><p> </p>","author_name":"Slate Podcasts"}