{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/695ff52ed8ac698e7e1291b4/6a19e8f9f7ef7759589021e2?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"AI Detectors Won’t Save Us","description":"<p>On today’s episode, host Kate Lindsay is joined by Ed Zitron, host of the podcast <a href=\"https://www.betteroffline.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Better Offline</a> and a certified hater of AI. After yet another AI writing scandal, this time involving the 2026 Commonwealth Short Story prize, Kate and Ed take a closer look at tools like Pangram that claim to detect AI writing with 99% accuracy. But if we can’t ever be sure, then no one knows what’s true at all—and that’s exactly how these institutions like it.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>This podcast is produced by Vic Whitley-Berry, Daisy Rosario, and Kate Lindsay.</p>","author_name":"Slate Podcasts"}