{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/695ea2381c1db1c5bdf7c59b/695ea26ae06ab03ba355d172?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Flowers, Crosses, Clauses and Oaths","description":"<p>A flurry of decisions this week, but few big-ticket items. Mark Joseph Stern takes us through  the opinions and dissents in <em>Flowers v Mississippi</em>, <em>Gundy v United States</em> and <em>American Legion v American Humanist Association</em>. Dahlia Lithwick is also joined by Jed Shugerman and Andrew Kent of Fordham University Law School, two of the authors of the Harvard Law Review article, <a href=\"https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3260593\">Faithful Execution and Article II</a>, which examines whether the constitution holds the President to some higher standard than just <a href=\"https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-conway-trump-is-a-cancer-on-the-presidency-congress-should-remove-him/2019/04/18/e75a13d8-6220-11e9-bfad-36a7eb36cb60_story.html?utm_term=.d64e9a1978ee\">not doing crimes</a>.</p><p> </p>","author_name":"Slate Podcasts"}