{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/695ea2381c1db1c5bdf7c59b/695ea26a4c8cfced7f960e9c?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"An Elegy for the Voting Rights Act","description":"<p>A Supreme Court brain trust gathers for this year’s Amicus Breakfast Table. Dahlia Lithwick is joined by <a href=\"https://its.law.nyu.edu/facultyprofiles/index.cfm?fuseaction=profile.overview&amp;personid=40825\">Melissa Murray</a>, professor at NYU School of Law and co-host of the podcast <em>Strict Scrutiny</em>; <a href=\"https://law.stanford.edu/directory/jeffrey-l-fisher/\">Jeffrey Fisher</a>, Stanford Law School professor and co-director of Stanford’s Supreme Court Litigation clinic; <a href=\"https://www.nyclu.org/en/biographies/perry-grossman\">Perry Grossman</a>*, senior staff attorney at the New York Civil Liberties Union’s Voting Rights Project; and of course, Slate’s own <a href=\"https://slate.com/author/mark-joseph-stern\">Mark Joseph Stern</a>. Together, they analyze the shape of the court and the ramification of its decisions at the end of the 2020 term. </p><p>*Perry Grossman appeared on this podcast in a personal capacity, and views expressed do not necessarily represent the NYCLU.</p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://my.slate.com/plus?utm_medium=link&amp;utm_campaign=plus_pod&amp;utm_content=Amicus&amp;utm_source=show_notes\">Sign up for Slate Plus</a> now to listen and support our show.</p><p><br></p><p>Podcast production by Sara Burningham.</p><p> </p>","author_name":"Slate Podcasts"}