{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/695ea2381c1db1c5bdf7c59b/695ea267313b808065cf15c0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Gerrymandering Goes Back to Court","description":"<p>When the Supreme Court term opens next month, perhaps no issue will be more urgent – and more complicated – than voting rights. One of the first cases the justices will hear is <a href=\"http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/gill-v-whitford/\"><em>Gill v. Whitford</em></a>, a challenge to the 2011 redrawing of district lines in Wisconsin. While the Court has struck down racially-motivated gerrymanders in the past, no election map has ever been rejected as a purely <em>partisan</em> gerrymander. And recent developments have some court watchers concerned that Justice Anthony Kennedy may still not be ready to do that. Our guest this episode is <a href=\"http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/\">Richard Hasen</a>, Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine, and curator of the must-read <a href=\"http://electionlawblog.org/\">Election Law Blog</a>. </p><p>Please let us know what you think of <em>Amicus</em>. Join the discussion of this episode on <a href=\"https://www.facebook.com/amicuspodcast\">Facebook</a>. Our email is <a href=\"mailto:amicus@slate.com\">amicus@slate.com</a>. Podcast production by Tony Field. </p><p> </p>","author_name":"Slate Podcasts"}