{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/695ea2381c1db1c5bdf7c59b/695ea25b313b808065cf11ee?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"27 Years On Death Row","description":"<p>“Prosecutors elicited perjury and a man's gonna go to his death. We can't allow that to happen.” – Paul Clement, October 9th, 2024. </p><p>This week the US Supreme Court heard arguments in the latest chapter in the <a href=\"https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/10/richard-glossip-supreme-court-wrongful-convictions-prosecutors.html\">complex and prolonged legal battle involving Richard Glossip</a>, who has been on Oklahoma's death row since his conviction for a 1997 murder-for-hire. Following two independent investigations into allegations of <a href=\"https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/10/clarence-thomas-kill-richard-glossip-supreme-court-arguments.html\">prosecutorial misconduct</a>, suppression of material evidence, and a history of inadequate defense counsel, Oklahoma’s Attorney General took the bold step of confessing to constitutional error in the case and supporting a new trial. But <a href=\"https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/09/glossip-oklahoma-supreme-court-innocence-executions.html\">Oklahoma’s State Supreme Court is pressing on with Glossip’s execution</a>, and so, on Wednesday morning, the High Court heard a case long on the <em>appearance</em> of process and short on <em>actual</em> justice.<a href=\"https://fdprc.capdefnet.org/project-staff/don-knight\"> Don Knight</a>, Richard Glossip’s attorney of almost 10 years, provides insights into the flawed process, and the shocking revelations from newly discovered evidence boxes. This case highlights broader questions about <a href=\"https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/04/supreme-court-wrong-richard-glossip-execution-oklahoma.html\">justice, fairness, and trust in the American legal system</a>…. Leading us to an update from the latest inductee to the Lady Justice Hall of Fame – Amicus listener Barbara Hausman-Smith, and her one-woman protest at One First Street. Listen to the end of the show to find out what links this 76-year-old grandmother from Maine to the late <a href=\"https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/11/ruth-bader-ginsburg-on-gay-marriage-a-constitutional-necessity.html\">Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and SCOTUS’s landmark decision to legalize equal marriage</a> in <em>Obergefell</em> in 2015. </p><p>Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on <a href=\"https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts/id928790786\">Apple Podcasts</a> and <a href=\"https://open.spotify.com/show/7DpL32jgjwBTah8o9HQkBl\">Spotify</a>. Or, visit <a href=\"https://slate.com/podcast-plus?utm_medium=link&amp;utm_campaign=plus_pod&amp;utm_content=Amicus&amp;utm_source=show_summary\">slate.com/amicusplus</a> to get access wherever you listen.</p><p> </p>","author_name":"Slate Podcasts"}