{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/695e5ac1adf9f2c53a665a53/6ad5cbe084e39f52e4560449?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Casino Royale (2006): Daniel Craig, Bond Girls & a Very Gay 007 Ranking","description":"<p><strong>Daniel Craig in tiny swimming trunks, a very dangerous poker game, and the important question: which James Bond is actually the sexiest?</strong></p><p>Hello Gazers!</p><p>This week we&#39;re dusting off our tuxedos, ordering something shaken rather than stirred, and heading back to <strong>2006</strong> for <strong>Casino Royale</strong>, the film that reinvented James Bond for a new generation.</p><p>But was Daniel Craig&#39;s tougher, moodier and considerably more muscular 007 really a step forward? Or was he simply the same old Bond with a gym membership and a slightly more troubled expression?</p><p>First, we&#39;re revisiting the film itself, from <strong>Le Chiffre&#39;s high-stakes poker tournament</strong> and Bond&#39;s increasingly complicated relationship with <strong>Vesper Lynd</strong>, to some particularly uncomfortable encounters, spectacular action sequences and a memorable finale in Venice.</p><p>We explore how <em>Casino Royale</em> revitalised the franchise, the controversy surrounding Craig&#39;s casting, the film&#39;s critical and commercial success, and whether its grittier approach borrowed a little too enthusiastically from the <em>Bourne</em> films.</p><p>Then it&#39;s time for <strong>Culture Corner</strong>, where we&#39;re heading back to Britain in 2006.</p><p>It was the era of <strong>metrosexual men, lads&#39; magazines, Top Gear and an increasingly confused national conversation about masculinity</strong>.</p><p>As traditional ideas about manhood collided with changing attitudes towards gender, class and sexuality, we ask whether Daniel Craig&#39;s more physically imposing but emotionally vulnerable Bond reflected a wider cultural shift.</p><p>And what better way to explore changing masculinity than by examining every James Bond?</p><p>From <strong>Sean Connery&#39;s unapologetic swagger</strong> and <strong>Roger Moore&#39;s raised eyebrow</strong> to <strong>Timothy Dalton&#39;s intensity</strong>, <strong>Pierce Brosnan&#39;s polished charm</strong> and <strong>Daniel Craig&#39;s brooding physicality</strong>, we&#39;re examining how each incarnation of 007 treated women, expressed masculinity and reflected the attitudes of his era.</p><p>Naturally, this leads to the most academically rigorous segment in the history of The Problematic Gays:</p><p><strong>Our ranking of the James Bonds by hotness.</strong></p><p>Yes, we&#39;re objectifying the world&#39;s most famous womaniser for a change.</p><p>We also discuss Bond girls, exotic locations, racial stereotypes, the franchise&#39;s enthusiastic product placement, and that famous moment when Daniel Craig emerges from the sea and suddenly becomes the object of everyone&#39;s gaze.</p><p>Has Bond genuinely evolved, or does <em>Casino Royale</em> simply package some very old-fashioned attitudes in a rather attractive new body?</p><p>We finish with our ratings for the film, our thoughts on the wider Bond franchise and the usual question:</p><p><strong>Could you get away with it today?</strong></p><p>And next time, we&#39;re heading somewhere rather less glamorous as we revisit <strong>Carrie (1976)</strong>.</p><p>Subscribe to <strong>The Problematic Gaze</strong> for more classic film and television, cultural nostalgia, questionable attitudes and the occasional entirely unnecessary discussion about attractive men.</p><p><strong>The name&#39;s Gaze. Problematic Gaze.</strong></p>","author_name":"David Moor and Lee Arnott"}