{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/695d5c48154465cd6010f4b3/695d5c6939d31c8588430f11?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Teaching Civics Can’t Save Democracy","description":"<p>On today’s episode of Hear Me Out… <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ8psP4S6BQ\">I’m just a bill</a>.</p><p><br></p><p>A lot of Americans will agree, even across party lines, that our democracy feels broken. A commonly proposed solution is beefing up, or formalizing, the way we teach young people civics. </p><p>Entities from the Center for American Progress to <a href=\"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/vivek-ramaswamy-wants-civics-tests-young-voters-18-to-24/\">Vivek Ramaswamy</a> have suggested that it’s time that we get students to know more about their government — in the hopes that knowing more leads to caring more, and engaging more. But by prioritizing civics, what else could students be missing? </p><p>Reason Magazine’s <a href=\"https://twitter.com/CBarnard33\">Christian Barnard</a> is our guest, here to argue that <a href=\"https://reason.com/2023/09/13/civics-in-public-schools-wont-fix-american-democracy/\">civics won’t save us</a>.</p><p><br></p><p>If you have thoughts you want to share, or an idea for a topic we should tackle, you can email the show: <a href=\"mailto:hearmeout@slate.com\">hearmeout@slate.com</a></p><p>Podcast production by Maura Currie</p><p><br></p><p><em>You can skip all the ads in Hear Me Out by joining Slate Plus. Sign up now at </em><a href=\"http://slate.com/awordplus\"><em>slate.com/hearmeoutplus</em></a><em> for just $15 a month for your first three months.</em></p><p> </p>","author_name":"Slate Podcasts"}